Friday, October 03, 2025

Assadudin Owaisi & Omar Abdullah: Why is "I love Muhammad" wrong?

Heights of Moral Depravity & High Treason!
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi "No one was named Mohammad other than the Prophet Mohammad. If you install his posters, you have to respect them. What is the problem? What is anti-national here? What sort of violence does this promote? If the word is 'love' then why is anyone having a problem? A Muslim's faith is not complete until he loves Prophet Muhammad more than everything else in the world. What message are you sending to the world by objecting to this? I think we have to play the 'Mohabbat Zindabad' song from Mughal-e-Azam for these people. If there can be a 'Happy Birthday PM Modi' poster then why can't there be an 'I Love Prophet Muhammad' poster?"

Omar Abdullah: "Even if you link it to a religion, what is wrong with this slogan? Don't followers of other religions write about their deities? Don't our Sikh brothers & sisters write about their gurus? Don't our Hindu brothers & sisters write about their various gods? They do. Go anywhere outside Jammu & Kashmir, & you will hardly find a vehicle without a picture of a deity. If that is not unlawful, then how is this?"

Sources: «Asaduddin Owaisi fumes over #BareillyRiots: "I can say 'I love Modi' but not 'I love Muhammad' in India!"» & «'Muslims' faith is incomplete until…': Asaduddin Owaisi reacts to 'I Love Muhammad' row.»
Mahomettanism's Predation Upon India, Ghazwa-e-Hind
Was The False Prophet Muhammad, the first person with that name? That is false. (Quora.com) The evidence is that in "pre-Islamic Arabia," Muhammad was long used as a first name. It was also an Arabic title for our Lord God Jesus Christ. The false prophet's true name is Qutham AbdAlLatt. Many years ago, I read how an Apologist for Mahomettanism or "Islam" narrated the story of a "pre-Islamic" Christian martyr who was either named Muhammad or was the grandson of a Muhammad. I believe that this was "Abdullah ibn Abu Bakr ibn Muhammad" who was martyred in Najran in 523 A.D. Now, of course, Mahomettans are lying, to pretend that this story was invented by Christians. That is beneath contempt.

Why does anyone have any kind of broad, unconditional "obligation" to respect the "I Love Muhammad" posters?

Should we honor posters that say, "I Love Hitler," or "I love Jinnah," or "I love Nathuram Godse"?

Why not?

And if there is such an obligation, is not there a reciprocal obligation on Mahomettan Infidels to honor and respect posters saying, "Jesus says, 'I and the Father are one!'"?

"He that believes in Jesus Christ is not judged. But he that does not believe, is already judged: because he disbelieves in the name of the only begotten Son of God." (John iii, 18)

"He that believes in Jesus Christ as the Son of God, has the testimony of God in himself. He that believes not in Jesus Christ as God the Son incarnate, makes Him (God) a liar: because he believes not in the testimony which God has testified of His Son. And this is the testimony, that God has given to us Eternal Life which Life is in His Son. He that accepts Jesus Christ as God the Son, has Life. He that denies that Jesus Christ is God the Son, does not have the Eternal Life." (1 John v, 10-12).


Will Owaisi respect a Poster that says, "#ILoveBacon"?

Or is this just #MeallyMouthedHypocrisy, #Grandstanding, eh?

Owaisi says, "If the word is 'love' then why is anyone having a problem?"

Okay, so, as per Owaisi, if a man say, "I love to murder, and to torture, people," that is him expressing his lovingness? Retard!

Obviously, Owaisi can have no objection to "#ILoveBacon"!


Who was Muhammad, and what does he stand for? Muhammad openly declared that he was a terrorist, with pride. Sunnah.com: «Narrated Ibn 'Umar that the "Prophet" said, "My livelihood is under the shade of my spear, and he who disobeys my orders will be humiliated by paying Jizya."»

Muhammad was also a rapist. When he and his fellow terrorists attacked & kidnapped the people of Awtas, and when the False Prophet returned, he found that his fellow terrorists had been shy and so had not raped the women of Awtas, saying, "We can't do so, we feel shy to do so, in front of their husbands!" And Muhammad and his Demon Allah became angry with them, positively commanding, "You must rape them!" This is when the "#MilkAlYamin" "revelation" was given! #DeenAlMilkAlYamin! (Quran.com) (Sunnah.com)

Muhammad was a pedophile, who lusted after a 6 years old girl, and had sexual encounters, "thighing," etc., with her, and then penetrated her when she was 9 years old. Again, that's according to the Lunar Calendar, so in actual fact that girl was younger than 6 years and 9 years!

This sex pervert would have his Lolita wash his semen stained clothes and go to pray in the Mosque wearing clothes with wet stains from where she washed off his semen! Unbelievable pervert! (Sunnah.com). 

Muhammad lusted after his own daughter-in-law Zaynab, and, in order to get her, he pretended to abrogate adoption, and got his adopted son to divorce his wife, so that he could take her!

Muhammad was also a pathological misogynist, & Mahomettanism is pathological misogynist after him! 

It is obvious that "Allah," while being a Demon, was also frequently, Muhammad's sockpuppet, who allowed him to tweak, & customize his "revelations" to suit his own Sexcrazedness! Nowhere is this more apparent than with the "Huddood" provisions of "Shariah law," where, in order to protect his Lolita Atesha from accusations of relationships with other men, Muhammad changed the "Witness requirements," thus saving Ayesha, but condemning thousands of rape victim & other women down the ages to murder instead of prosecuting the perpetrators rapists, false accusers, such as in the case of Soraya Manutchehri, 1986, Iran. (Few things represents the absolute depravity of the #DeenAsAlShaitan more than the lynching-murder of Farkhunda Malikzada, March 19, 2015 A.D.!) 

Lunacy, & Imbecility, at its maximum — Muhammad & circular reasoning: "Women, you are deficient in intelligence!" 
"Why so?" 
"Is not the witness of a woman worth half of that of a man?" 

But who, specifically, WHICH IDIOTIC, IMBECILIC, "Authority" says that a woman's testimony is worth half of a man's? 

Why Muhammad himself, of course! 

In saner times, an ambulance would roll in, they'd put him in a straightjacket & hie him off to the looney bin!

Muhammad is a Cross-Dresser, a transvestite, which is a subset of Homosexuality or Sodomism, dressing in women's clothes. Sahih Bukhari chapter 54 and Hadith 2442 "He (Muhammad) said to her, 'Do not injure me regarding Ayesha, for I do not get revelations except when I am wearing her clothes!'" This Hadith has now been suppressed by Mahomettans from Sahih Bukhari! answering-islam.org

Muhammad had sex with his dead aunt Fatima's body, a sin called Necrophilia: Quora.com

Muhammad made a Peace Treaty with the Quraysh tribe, valid for 10 years, but after 2 years, because he was now militarily stronger, he broke the treaty to invade Mecca and butcher the Quraysh who resisted his impostures. This shows that he was a faithless man, a breaker of oaths and agreements!

Muhammad was a common robber, who waylaid and robbed travellers and merchants!

Muhammad had at least 3 night homosexual trysts with Hindu Jat mercenary soldiers and workers from India in Arabia of his time, #LaylatAsAzZutt. Mahomettan liars lie that Muhammad had gone to preach to "Jinns," but Jats or Zutts were human, not "jinns," and they obviously rode him all night!

Another suppressed hadith bears witness that when he did not have a woman to copulate with, Muhammad would "lovingly" copulate with his domestic animals! This is Bestiality, or Zoophilia, a type of Homosexuality, or Sodomism!

All in all, Muhammad was the most depraved, immoral, man in human history: Compulsive Rapist, Pathological Pedophile, Pathological Misogynist, Murderer, Robber, Liar, Faithless Breaker of Oaths & Agreements, Transvestite or Crossdresser, Homosexual, Bestialist or Zoophiliac, Necrophiliac, and worse!

However, Muhammad also taught "Ghazwa-E-Hind": That the Mahomettan Infidel Collective, or "Ummah," should invade & holocaust India! Sunnah.com

This is treason against India, sedition, and far, far, worse. It makes it impossible for a Mahomettan Infidel to be a truthful and loyal citizen of India!

When people claiming to be "Indians" celebrate "I love Muhammad," they are celebrating Treason and worse against India.

Any sane community of people will #DisenfranchiseExpropriateAndExpel such a people as Mahomettans from amongst themselves!


Lucio Mascarenhas, #BombayNotMumbai & Goa, Whatsapp; repairmychurch.blogspot.com, Interdum blog & The Way Of The Saints. The Eteo-Catholic or Sempiternal orthodox True Catholic Church: VaticanInExile-Official.org.

No comments: