Judging Diego Maradona

Is Diego Maradona in Heaven or Hell? Can I Judge?

Lucio Mascarenhas, Nov 28, 2020. https://www.vaticaninexile.com.

When Diego Maradona died recently, a lot of people joined in the adulation. I pointed out that he was an atheist and a Communist, one who supported the communist terrorist and murderers of hundreds of thousands of Catholics, Infidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. Hugo Chavez was a military officer who tried to seize power in a coup, later founding a Socialist-Communist populist party that won power in Venezuela. Chavez died in office of cancer, and has been succeeded by his chief acolyte, the Jew Nicholas Maduro. These two men, Hugo Chávez and Nicolas Maduro, have made Venezuela, what was once one of the richest countries in the world, into one of the very most poor countries in the world, and driven millions into starvation, beggary and exile. Diego Maradona is also most notoriously an admirer of the Communist terrorist Che Guevara who was not only a terrorist, but also raped and murdered a child. He had Che Guevara's picture tattooed on his upper arm. (By the way, the Bible forbids tattos, and today nearly all the "Catlicks" in South Asia have tattos! It is part of the "New Gospel" Identitarianism! But that is another topic).

It is said that Diego Maradona was born dirt poor, and that his father was from the native American Tupi Guarani peoples, therefore his hostility to Catholicism. In the last 500 years, the Catholic Church did more for the Tupi Guarani people than it did for any other ethnic group. The Jesuits sought and obtained from the Government of Spain the setting aside of large Indian territories called the Missions or the Jesuit Reductions, over the lands of the Tupi Guarani people, evangelized and helped them to assimilate into Latin America. Protestant England corrupted the Portuguese, through King Joseph of Braganca and his chief henchman Joseph de Melo whom King Joseph later made into the Marquis of Pombal. The two Josephs admired Protestant England and sought to conform Portugal to Protestant England, to split it away from the Catholic Church, and to "modernize" Portugal in the same way that the inhuman "Protestant Work Ethic" and the large-scale landgrabs were instituted by the Protestant Robbers / Kleptocrats who stole England from the Catholics, including in the so-called Industrial Revolution and the formation of the Capitalist system.

As part of this Protestantisation of Portugal, Portugal progressively implementing a mitigated form of Protestant White Racism & Supremacism, as practised in Protestant England, that was born out of the Heresies of Jean Chauvin, and reinforced by Jansenius. For this reason, Portugal betrayed and destroyed, the Kingdom of Congo, in Africa, which was its very close ally. At the same time, and as part of the same effort, Portugal unleashed terrorist militias called the Bandeirantes (flagbearers) or Mamelucos, on Spanish South America, on the Tupi Guarani Jesuit Missions, killing, raping, enslaving the Tupi Guarani people, as part of the Jewish, Protestant and English worldwide gameplan. South and West Brazil, the Rio Grande do Sul and other areas bordering Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia were thus invaded and annexed by Portugal, under Pombalism, to Brazil.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandeirantes

"Trickery could also be used; one common tactic was disguising themselves as Jesuits, often singing Mass to lure the natives out of their settlements. At the time, the Jesuits had a deserved reputation as the only colonial force that treated the natives somewhat fairly in the Jesuit reductions of the region. If luring the natives with promises did not work, the bandeirantes would surround the settlements and set them alight, forcing inhabitants out into the open. At a time when imported African slaves were comparatively expensive, the bandeirantes were able to sell large numbers of native slaves at a huge profit due to their relatively inexpensive price.

"By the 17th century, Jesuit missions had become a favorite target of the expeditions. A bandeira ("flag march") that took place in 1628 and was organized by Antônio Raposo Tavares raided 21 Jesuit villages in the upper Paraná Valley, ultimately capturing about 2,500 natives. A bandeira tactic was to set native tribes against each other in order to weaken them, and then to enslave both sides.

"In 1636, Tavares led a bandeira , composed of 2,000 allied Indians, 900 mamelucos, and 69 white Paulists, to find precious metals and stones and to capture Indians for slavery. This expedition alone was responsible for the destruction of most of the Jesuit missions of Spanish Guayrá and the enslavement of over 60,000 indigenous people."

"The bandeirantes were also responsible for unsteady relations between the Spanish Empire and the Portuguese Empire, as they essentially conducted an undeclared war on indigenous residents allied with Spain or the Jesuits. With only a few outlying Spanish settlements surviving and the majority of Jesuit missions overrun, the de facto control by Portugal over most of what is now the Southeast, Southern, and Central West territory of Brazil was recognized by the Treaties of Madrid in 1750 and San Ildefonso in 1777. Additionally, Portugal officially expelled the Jesuits in 1759, reducing the ability of the Jesuits to fight back even further.

"These expeditions were catastrophic for the native peoples, who were either killed through sheer violence or due to diseases and poor sanitation, or were reduced to slavery, stripped of their identity and expulsed from their ancestral lands. Nevertheless, the Bandeirantes are generally considered heroes in traditional Brazilian historiography; this may be slowly changing, as protests in 2020 have brought back up the more unsavory parts of the bandeirantes activity to light."

When I wrote that Diego Maradona, an atheist and a Communist, is now damned in hell, I was told, "How do you know? You are not the judge!"

That "Judge Not" is based on Matthew vii, Matthew chapter 7.

We all make judgments of Discernment, that has an impact on our lives and on the lives of those we accept and those we reject.

We decide what is good and what is bad, who we shall consort with and whom we shall not consort with, how we shall worship and how we shall not worship.

So, the man that tells me, "How do you know? You are not the judge!" says that he firmly judges that Karol Wojtyla and "Mother Teresa" are Saints in Heaven; these persons (Wojtyla & "Mother Teresa") taught and practiced that "All gods are one, all religions are true, one can attain Heaven through the practice of any religion whatsoever." So I have challenged him numerous times: Walk the talk! Post me pictures of you publicly worshipping the Demon Ganpati, but he recoils with horror and disgust! HE JUDGES that as a "Christian," it is "wrong" for him to teach that "All gods are one, all religions are true, one can attain Heaven through the practice of any religion whatsoever," or to worship the Monster Ganapati whether Publicly or privately! He judges! Yet, he says that I am not to judge!

If I give you a cup of drink, and say, I have mixed poison in it, but drink it anyway, for who are you, or I, to judge?, would you drink it? Would you refuse to judge the possibility, the probability, that I speak, not in jest, but in truth, and that drinking it will kill you?

We choose who to marry and who not to marry, we make a judgment.

We choose which school, academy and university we will seek admission from.

We choose what jobs we will seek.

We choose to accept certain people as our friends, some as acquaintances, some as very close, bosom buddies. We equally choose not to accept the friendship of some, not to associate with some, not to consort with them.

We choose what food to eat and what not to eat.

Those who choose to vote, choose to exercise a judgment as to who will be the best or, at least, not the worst bet, for public office.

In all this we exercise judgment.

My friend that said, "Who are you to judge?" says that he judges that George Borgoglio is "Pope Francis," and that Karol Wojtyla and "Mother Teresa" are saints in Heaven. Since Borgoglio and Wojtyla and "Mother Teresa" teach / taught that Jesus and Ganapati, are one (God), I asked him to publicly worship Ganapati. He judges that God forbids him from that. Who is he to judge against Ganapati as true God?

Let us examine the Context of Mathew vii.

"Judge not, that you may not be judged, For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you measure out, it shall be measured to you again. And why do you see the mote / speck that is in your brother's eye, and do not see the beam that is in your own eye? Or how do you say to your brother: Let me cast the mote out of your eye; and behold a beam is in your own eye? You hypocrite! cast out first the beam in your own eye, and then you shall the better see to cast out the mote out of your brother's eye! Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast you your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you to pieces. Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you. For every one that asketh, receives: and he that seeks, finds: and to him that knocks, it shall be opened. Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he give him a stone? Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he give him a snake? If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Father who is in Heaven, give good things to them that ask Him? All things therefore whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them. For this is the Law and the Prophets." Matthew chapter 7 http://drbo.org/chapter/47007.htm.

Is that an absolute "Judge Not"?

How can we "judge" as to what is a "beam" and what instead is a "mote" or a "speck," if we are absolutely to "Judge Not"?

How can we judge that what we are giving to dogs, or casting before swine, is "Holy," or "Pearls," and not to be given / cast before, if we are absolutely to "Judge Not"?

How are we to discern and to judge, if we are absolutely to "Judge Not"?

The Gospel of John puts this differently: "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge just judgment." John vii, 24 http://drbo.org/chapter/50007.htm.

So that is then not an absolute "Judge Not."

I will quote a "Newchurcher" on "Judge Not": A Newchurcher is one who follows the Roman Protestant Vatican 2 self described "New Church," giving the Catholic Bible (Douay-Challoner-MacMahon version) where he cites the Protestant Bible (It is usual for Newchurchers to quote Protestant Bibles rather than Catholic Bibles!)

«Just and righteous are both translations of the same Hebrew word.

«"For Yahweh loveth judgment, and forsaketh not his saints; they are preserved for ever: but the seed of the wicked shall be cut off." Psalm 37:28 (Protestant) "For the Lord loves judgment, and will not forsake His saints: they shall be preserved for ever. The unjust shall be punished, and the seed of the wicked shall perish." (Catholic).

r «"Yahweh openeth [the eyes of] the blind: Yahweh raiseth them that are bowed down: Yahweh loveth the righteous." Psalm 146:8 (Protestant) "The Lord enlightens the blind. The Lord lifts up them that are cast down: the Lord loves the just." (Catholic).

«"Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?" 1 Corinthians 6:2-6 (Protestant) "Know you not that the saints shall judge this world? And if the world shall be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know you not that we shall judge angels? how much more the things of this world?" (Catholic).

"You shall do My judgments, and keep Mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the Lord your God. Ye shall therefore keep My statutes, and My judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord." Leviticus 18:4-5 (Protestant) "You shall do My judgments, and shall observe My precepts, and shall walk in them. I am the Lord your God. Keep My laws and My judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them. I am the Lord." (Catholic).

"Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour." Leviticus 19:15 (Protestant). "You shall not do that which is unjust, nor judge unjustly. Respect not the person of the poor, nor honour the countenance of the mighty. But judge your neighbour according to justice." (Catholic).»

Did Jesus Christ actually say in an absolute sense, "Do not judge"? When examined carefully, it is obvious that that is the pretence of Hypocrites. Yes, that is right: I judge that that pretence, a pretension that Jesus Christ absolutely forbade us from making judgements, as Hypocrisy and as the last refuge of Hypocrites!

We live in the time of a man who claims to be the highest authority for Christians, who says, Who am I to judge? when asked about Homosexuals, and then, in effect says that orthodox Catholics are Clericalists, Pelagians, Coprophages (Shit eaters in plain english), Rosary counters, and such like. He judges Donald Trump as a "bad Christian," and indeed as "not a Christian," but anyone who works to destroy what remains of Christianity and of Christendom, he judges as the most moral of persons! There is a very open Hypocrisy in his Judging of some and in his "Refusal" to Judge others, in his Condemnation of some and in his Loving Embrace of others. Most remarkable, and something that is rather open and in-your-face is his Loving Embrace of those that God insistently Condemns and Excludes, and his Hatred of, and Maliciousness towards, those that God and His Catholic Church have always praised and extolled! He condemns those who are loyal to God, and he exculpates those that practise Sodomy, which God said is the practically the most obscene sin and crime! Yet, people not only do not take this man to task, do not Judge this Poor Excuse of a Pagan, this High Priest of Pachamama, and an Apostate, they take me to task, they sit in judgement over me, for questioning this man's "Divine Right" to anti-Catholic hypocrisy! They judge that Jesus Christ forbade me from judging, but that they may judge!

This man, High Priest of Pachamama, of the Bloodthirsty Demoness Pachamama to whom the pre-Columbian Pagans sacrificed and poured forth the blood of babies, is the 6th in his line of frauds who condemns Catholics and who exculpate Sodomists. This line of Rascals of the First Order have made it their Official teaching that "The Catholic Church does not condemn Sodomism as evil, or exclude Sodomites from her life!" In a way, however, they are truthful, for the "Church" they head and govern is as Catholic as Julian the Apostate or as the Aga Khan or the Dalai Lama!

I will now "digress" by quoting the great Doctor of the Church, St John the Golden-Mouthed (Chrysostom means Golden mouth).

"'Judge not, and ye shall not be judged' (Luke vi, 37). What does this mean? Are we not to denounce those who sin? Why, then, does Paul say, ‘Reprove, entreat, rebuke!' (2 Timothy iv, 2), and 'Reprove before (ie, in front of) everyone those who sin' (1 Timothy v, 20)? Christ also said to Peter, ‘Rebuke him, and if he will not obey, tell the Church' (Matthew xviii, 15-17). Why, then, did He give His Apostles the power of the keys? For, if they are not to judge, they are without authority, and in vain have they received the power of binding and loosing. Besides, if this were the case, everything in the churches and cities and homes would come to an end. And, unless we correct our enemies, we shall never put an end to enmity, and everything would be turned upside down. Therefore, let us take care to study the meaning of what is said here, so that no one may think that the remedies of our salvation are laws of disorder and confusion. For, Our Lord has made as clear as possible to those who have understanding the perfection of this law, saying: 'First cast the beam out of your own eye' (Luke vi, 42). You see, He does not forbid us to judge, but commands us first to remove the beam from our own eyes, and only then correct the faults of others." (St. John Chrysostom, On Matthew, homily XXIV, pg. 57, SS vol. III).

What is obvious is that Jesus Christ warns against, and forbids and excludes Rash and Presumptuous Judgment, and Hypocritical Judgment. The Catholic Church has always taught that we can and must judge but that we must very certainly not be Rash in judging, for Rashness is the very opposite of Justice, nor must we be Presumptuous, not Presume to place ourselves in the position of the Supreme judge, who is God, claiming to lay down absolute and definite judgment.

Do I? Have I judged Diego Maradona Rashly, Presumptuously, Hypocritically?

I have stated what I have stated based on Catholic theology.

1. Catholicism states that all those outside the Catholic Church, will be damned. The only exception is Invincible Ignorance. Are we able to even Pretend that Diego Maradona may had suffered from Invincible Ignorance? Not without doing violence to the Truth!

2. The Catholic Church affirms that only the God of the Bible, which is the Triune God, consisting of three distinct persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, is the true God; that Jesus Christ is God the Son who became flesh as a real human being, and that He willingly gave Himself up into the hands of the wicked, of the sinners, that He may be illtreated and murdered, for the Sins of all humanity, that Jesus Christ then rose up again from the Dead, that He then ascended to Heaven where He sits at the Right Hand of God the Father; that He founded a definite body as His Church, replacing the Mosaic Church or the Church of the Covenant that was entrusted to the Prophet Moses, with the renewed Church as the Christian Church, not a new creation but a continuation of the same body of the faithful as before; that there is No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church, etc.

3. The Catholic Church, Canon Law and the Popes have repeatedly stated that a person who publicly and with pertinacity (stubbornness), recedes from the holistic Catholic faith in even one point, they have thereby ceased to be Catholics: such are called, in Canon Law, "Public and Manifest Heretics" or "Public and Manifest Apostates," as the case may be.

4. That the Catholic Church teaches that when an Ecumenical Council that is accepted and endorsed by a legitimate Catholic Pope as the Head of the College of Bishops, speaks, it is God that speaks, through God the Holy Ghost. The Council of Florence in its Decree for the Jacobites, "Cantate Domino," taught that all those who refused to submit to the Catholic Church or who have publicly and manifestly abandoned or left the Catholic Church, and died, unreconciled, to the Catholic Church, are, Eternally Damned to Hell, by Jesus Christ. Let me quote verbatim: "It firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart 'into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matthew xxv, 41) unless, before the end of life, the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed his blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."

Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Fidel "Infidel" Castro, Che Guevara, were "born Catholics," born, at least nominally, to Catholic parents.

Are they (Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Fidel "Infidel" Castro, Che Guevara, etc.) persons who have died as faithful Catholics?

Did Diego Maradona die as a faithful Catholic?

If Chi Guevara (I deliberately use "Chi" which is Indian for "filthy" instead of "Che") and Diego Maradona died as faithful Catholics, then so did Hitler and Goebbels!

If Chi Guevara is a "Martyr," then so are Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels!

Is there a Rascal, a Public Reprobate, a Spiritual Prostitute, so barefaced and brazen faced, as to allege that the Eternally Damned Chi Guevara, Diego Maradona, Infidel Castro, and the Traidores Simon Bolivar, Joseph Martin, Manuel Belgrano, Raymond Castilla, Andrew de Santa Cruz, Joseph Artigas, Francis de Miranda, Marian Moreno, Bernardo Ohiggins, Agustin Iturbide, Anthony Sucre, Peter da Braganca, etc., are not Eternally Damned but are Saints in Heaven?

Even if there are such Liars, a Christian is bound to ignore and to contemn them, and not join them.

But you that disagree, don't be hypocrites, "walk the talk," "go the whole hog," post me pictures of you publicly worshipping the Demon Ganpati! Put your actions were your mouths are!


Lúcío Mascarenhas, Plenipotentiary Apostolic of His Holiness Pope Michael I #ReturnToCatholicism https://www.vaticaninexile.com/joining_the_true_catholic_church.php

The Rick Mathes Narrative against Mahomettanism

Appraising the Aderemi Akin or Rick Mathes "What Is An Infidel" also known as "Allah versus Jesus" also known as the "Dr Aderemi Akin vs Imam Story"

By Lucio Mascarenhas, November 22, 2020. https://www.vaticaninexile.com.

According to the orthodox understanding of Christianity, Jesus Christ claimed to be God incarnate, come to die for the sins of man, willingly allowed Himself to be seized, iltreated and murdered by Renegade Jews, rose again, ascended to Heaven, where, as true God and True man, the Hypostatic Union, He sits at the "Right hand of God," that He commanded His Apostles to go out into the fullness of humanity and to preach His Good News, and said that those who accepted would attain to Heaven, and those who rejected Him and His Gospel, would be Eternally Damned; the Bible also closed Salvific Public Revelation in Galatians chapter 1 and in 2 John chapter 1, verses 10-11, so that no subsequent promulgators of new salvific revelations, including Mahomettanism and Mormonism, can be accepted as being legitimately from God.

Galatians, chapter 1, verses 6-9, reads: "I wonder that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another gospel. Which is not truly another Gospel, only that there are some that trouble and mislead you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed! As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be accursed!"

Thus St. Paul the Apostle and the Bible, the Word of God, barred the way as Accursed! for any other contrary or amending or supplantory "New Gospel," including those of Marcion, Manes, Arius, Nestorius, Muhammad, Peter Valdes, John Wycliffe, John Huss, Martin Luther, Jean Chauvin, Thomas Munzer, Henry Tudor, Jansenius, Joseph Smith, Charles Taze Russell, Mary Ellen White, etc., etc.

Mahomettanism claims to be a further Salvific Revelation subsequent to, and superseding Christianity, which is totally excluded by the Gospel of Jesus Christ, by the teachings of the Apostles in the Bible, particularly Galations 1 and 1 John 1, so that Mahomettanism is not a legitimate religion from God, but is a fraud, and is from Satan. Anyone who is a sincere, believing and orthodox Christian cannot but accept these truths and its condemnations of Mahomettanism as false, and as a fraud that emanates from Satan.

I received this on WhatsApp on Saturday, Nov 21, 2020:

«FROM DR. ADEREMI AKIN

«As it stands today, the Islamic religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the United States, especially amongst the minority races!!

«Last month I attended my annual training session that's required for maintaining my state prison security clearance. During the training session, there were presentations by three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim religions who each explained their beliefs.

«I was particularly interested in what the Muslim had to say. He gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video. After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers.

«When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Muslim and asked: "Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims), they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?"

«There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, "Non-believers!"

«I then responded. "So, let me make sure I have this straight i.e. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so that they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?"

«The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He sheepishly replied, "Yes."

«I then stated, "Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine that the Pope can command all Catholics to kill those of your faith or in addition, Dr Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!"

«The Muslim was speechless!

«I continued, "I also have a problem being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!

«"Let me ask you a question: Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me too?"

«You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam hung his head in shame.

«Needless to say, the organisers or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam and exposing the naked truth about the evil in Muslims' beliefs.»

There are many copies of this story attributed to "Dr Aderemi Akin" on the Internet. By searching further, i found that the original author of this write-up was not a Nigerian "Dr Aderemi Akin," but is a Protestant Pastor in the USA, Rick Mathes, of Chesterfield, Missouri, operating his "Mission Gate Prison Ministry" and who claimed this happened in May 2003 at the State Penitentiary, officially, the "Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center," in Fulton, Missouri, USA. See: https://www.rickmathes.net/2014/09/25/allah-or-jesus. See his "Ministry website" at https://www.missiongateministry.org.

Apparently, Mathes had initially titled his article or write-up, "What Is An Infidel," but later switched to "Allah Or Jesus." For convenience, I will refer to it as the "Mathes Narrative."

There are websites, entities, persons, groups, etc that claim to be "Hoax-slayers." Snopes.com is one. Snopes.com has given its take on the above Rick Mathes Narrative. Others are TruthOrFiction.com and Politifact.com. There are also others, as these three are but the leaders of a number of such "Hoax-slayers."

The first two of these have "rated" the Mathes Narrative, and rated it false, with others in this Echo Chamber parroting that.

Let's start with David Mikkelson's Snopes.com: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/allah-or-jesus.

«According to David Mikkelson of Snopes.com: "Reporter Greg Kearney, writing for the Lee News Service, came away with a decidedly different version of events from Missouri state officials. Tim Kniest, Public Information Officer for the Missouri Department of Corrections, described the event as a training program for prison volunteers, for which ministers from several faiths were invited to give presentations in order to acquaint the volunteers with the varied religious beliefs of the inmate population. The man who gave the presentation about Islam was not a Muslim minister; he was an inmate pressed into service to present a short film on Islam and answer some questions when the prison's Volunteership Coordinator was "unable to find an Imam to speak."

«Moreover, according to Mr. Kniest, the Volunteership Coordinator said that "The inmate did a good job. He was asked a few questions that were beyond his ability to answer. But he was not asked anything like what Matches claimed."

«"... the Volunteership Coordinator said that no such exchange as Mathes reported ever took place. "He certainly did not 'Hang his head in shame,'" according to Kniest. In fact, the inmate was thanked by the assembly before being escorted back to his quarters. Furthermore, the Coordinator does not recall any questions dealing with jihad [Holy war] against non-Muslims as reported by Mathes. Greg Kearney / Tim Kniest / Unnamed Prison Volunteership Coordinator denied Mathes' portrayal of the Muslim presentator as an Imam, or Islamic minister.»

Mikkelson goes on to add: «Regardless of whatever may have transpired at the prison training session referred to above, the larger point the writer is attempting to make in this piece is a grossly inaccurate one. Islam is not a monolithic religion in which unanimity of belief and action is coordinated from a central authority; it has well over a billion adherents in countries all over the world who belong to any one of a number of different sects with varying beliefs, traditions, and interpretations of scripture. No one Muslim (especially one who wasn’t even a cleric) could speak to what all of Islam believes, any more than a single member of a Methodist congregation could speak for every denomination and follower of Christianity.»

According to the original 2004 TruthOrFiction.com appraisal of the Mathes Narrative, "Rick Mathes says that the Muslim Presentator was introduced at the meeting as an Imam and that the story happened as he describes it."

The 2nd TruthOrFiction.com appraisal (See https://www.truthorfiction.com/infidels) is dated 2015 and is entirely excerpts from a Matthew Salmon's 2008 attack on the Mathes Narrative. I reproduce here the Salmon Excerpt from TruthOrFiction.com and from Matthew Salmon's own webpage (https://maffersalmon.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/response-to-%E2%80%9Callah-or-jesus-by-rick-mathes%E2%80%9D-forwarded-email):

«At first examination, I dismissed the forwarded email as a fabricated tale, designed to foster support for one denomination over the other, as well as to distinguish one culture as superior to another. Nevertheless, a quick Google search exposed the account as an honest and factual retelling of a particular occurrence in a prison in Fulton, Missouri, as retold by Rick Mathes. Rick Mathes is neither a trained theologian, nor schooled in Islamic Studies.

«Unfortunately, the retelling of this event, without proper understanding of the situation, individuals present and philosophical intricacies of theological/cultural/political discussion, leaves the reader with a false supposition of reality.

«To begin, the Imam in question was not trained in Islamic theology. In fact, the Imam was an inmate, recognized by his fellow peers within the institution as charismatic and devout.

«Unlike Christianity, in which the order of ordination and ministry often follows the examples of the ancient hierarchical structures of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, specifically honoring organization and accountability to higher recognized authorities, Islam has another unique organizational structure, involving community recognition and commonly accepted credentials, typically involving extended years of training and instruction. However, in a pinch, the Ummah, or community of believers, may recognize one as the leader of the group, albeit with reservation.

«The Imam does not act as the supreme religious head of most Ummahs, but more as the facilitator of group discussion and prayer, the responsibility of religious observation falling on each particular member individually.

«In this particular case, the Imam in question had an unfortunate complete lack of understanding regarding Islam (submission or worship of God), the Quran (The believed/accepted revealed Word of God) or the Hadiths of Muhammad (The traditional sayings and actions of Muhammad).

«I say unfortunate, because his response was completely misleading and erroneous....

«Islam, contrary to popular opinion propagated by news sources and talking pundits, is a religion of peace. Obviously, history has accredited much violence to the standard of the religion, but this is neither new, nor accurate. Contrary to the claims of atheist secularists such as Dawkins and Hitchins, religion is not the cause of human misery or suffering, nor is it the point of confrontation from which atrocities arise. Instead, religion has been used by the skillful and manipulative as the outward commonality under which political aspirations may be attained. Religion, on the other hand, is a set of principles, typically outlining peace, understanding, love and mutual respect. The Golden Rule is golden for a reason, because it transcends geopolitical boarders and philosophical differences, unifying religious thought throughout the world. Islam in particular advocated the love of the divine for humanity, and the continued process of revelation facilitating the twahid (unity) of all people. The central message of Islam states "there is no god but God." The statement may be read through a myriad of interpretations, but the most commonly accepted across nations and religious denominations concerns the unity of all natural existence, living and static. True harmony, Islam claims, exists when each recognizes the interconnectivity of all beings, and the dual nature of each reality. In this philosophical vein, only through understanding that which seems different can one understand oneself, and appreciate the manifestation of the transcendental, of the divine, of God, in everything.

«Islam, separate from later interpretations of nations, individuals and political groups, does not call for the death of anyone, nor does it claim any term such as infidel.

«In fact, no such word exists in the Arabic, the word from which infidel is usually translated, albeit poorly, is kafir, or literally 'One who covers, or is in hiding,' referring primarily to atheists or polytheists.

«Infidel in fact, has a uniquely English epistemology, and referred originally to those who rejected the divinity of Christ, or were free thinkers. Specifically, it was utilized during the crusades as a derogatory term for Muslims and Jews, and was used proficiently to persuade the Christian Knights, and later inquisitors, in the right action of war and inflicting death on the Saracen Muslims and Jews.

«Secondarily, the Quran, and Muhammad as well, specifically opposed the use of any violence, or derogatory term toward his Jewish and Zoroastrian neighbors, (who, by the way receive the honorary title 'people of the Book,' meaning people under covenant of God) under punishment of exclusion and expulsion from the Ummah, or Muslim community.

«Likewise, there are no promises for rewards in heaven for murder, be it for a kafir or one of the People of the Book. Such a passage does not exist.

«Rick Mathes comments more about his experience on his webpage, but continues to resist examining the reality of the situation further, and thus remains stagnant in the quagmire of false assumptions and overzealous faith in his own correctness of religious thought.»

From Salmon's reply, it is obvious that, by his research, he found that Rick Mathes' Narrative was substantially true or unrefutable, and so he, accepting that fact of the truth of Rick Mathes' Narrative, then proceeded to spin the facts, to claim that the Muslim Presentator was unqualified, and ignorant of Islam, while, he, a non-Muslim, claimed for himself a higher, intimate and Infallible knowledge of Islam, and certifies that it, Mahomettanism, is undoubtedly a Religion of Peace, and of brotherly love.

While Snopes.com and TruthOrFiction.com have taken a stand that is, in effect, against Rick Mathes and his Narrative, Politifact.com has ignored the Rick Mathes Narrative. I have searched and drawn a blank. However, Politifact.com does indeed take a stand in the Culture Wars for and against Mahomettanism, by affirming that Mahomettanism is indeed a Religion of Peace. One such specimen is this page: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/feb/11/chain- email/barbary-wars-did-us-declare-war-islam.

Politifact.com claims that: 1. The USA under President Thomas Jefferson did not declare war on Islam; 2. The attacks by the coastal Muslim states upon Christians, the abuse and enslavement of Christians captives, were all a "Protection Racket," and not religiously motivated ("Historians of the period say that religion was not a significant factor in the Barbary wars; historians say it was more like fighting the mafia than religious zealots; "Very little of this had to do with Islam, but had much more to do with trading opportunities and economics." Adrian Tinniswood, author of Pirates of Barbary: Corsairs, Conquests and Captivity in the Seventeenth-Century Mediterranean. "We (the USA) didn't attack them out of matters of faith. The Barbary Wars were all about freedom of the sea and protecting the U.S. flag," Lance Janda, a military historian at Cameron University).

Politifact.com then "sums up the case" and passes "judgment": "The Barbary powers were Muslim, and religion sometimes crops up in the historical record. But historians agree that the overriding motivation of American military action against the Barbary pirates was to secure a vital national interest, namely protecting the U.S. merchant fleet and its ability to conduct international trade. They see no evidence that Jefferson or his contemporaries were undertaking a religious holy war. So we rate the claim False."

It is true that the viral mails tend to add drama. That is how viral mails are structured: They are designed to shock and to grab your attention. Have the self- described "Hoax-Slayers" themselves been truthful as compared to those they sit in judgment over?

Politifact.com has played a sleight of hand. That the USA did not specifically go to war against Islam, is true; equally true is that the USA has always formally affirmed its irreligious foundation and nature, that it is not a Confessional State. The Viral Mails claim, that the USA went to war against Islam under Thomas Jefferson, is still true, because the USA found itself under attack by Muslims who affirmed that the reason they were waging their war, is because they are commanded to do so, by the Muslim religion, and so the USA was forced into a Defensive War against Islam in the Mediterranean Sea, against the Barbary States, even when it went on the Derna Offensive against its enemies.

Politifact.com, Snopes.com, TruthOrFiction.com all sedulously ignore the narrative of the First Barbary War. This Barbary War Narrative is included by Wikipedia, itself a Frontline Champion of Inclusivism, Pluralism and Islamophilia, just as Snopes, TruthOrFiction.com or Politifact.com are.

«In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury," the ambassador replied: "It was written in their Koran, (that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise). He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once." Jefferson reported this conversation to the US Secretary of Foreign Affairs John Jay, who submitted the ambassador's comments and offer to the US Congress."» See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War.

This is the Wikipedia page footnote: "American Peace Commissioners to John Jay," March 28, 1786, "Thomas Jefferson Papers," Series 1. General Correspondence. 1651–1827, Library of Congress. LoC: March 28, 1786 (handwritten). Philip Gengembre Hubert (1872). Making of America Project. The Atlantic Monthly, Atlantic Monthly Co. p. 413. Some sources confirm this wording, some other sources report this quotation with slight differences in wording.

The Statement of the Ambassador of Tripoli Mr Adja are a part of the US Congressional Record, beyond controversy, a part of the public record. It is only, however, one such statement of evidence. The successor state of Tripoli is Libya.

One can search carefully Snopes.com, TruthOrFiction.com or Politifact.com for a refutation of the Wikipedia page on the First Barbary War, on the encounter between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams with the Ambassador of Tripoli, Abd-ur-rahman Adja, and one will find nothing, zilch. This is a truth that cannot be refuted.

Another piece of Evidence is the Story of the Sudanese thinker and reformer Mahmoud Mohammed Taha who was executed as an Apostate from Mahomettanism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Mohammed_Taha.

Taha went against the Consensus of Mahomettanism that, affirms as Muhammad taught and affirmed, that the Revelations at Medina superseded the Revelations at Mecca, and that consequently, orthodox Islam considers the Meccan Revelations as abrogated and negated, superseded by the Medinian Revelations. The Meccan Revelatons taught peaceful coexistence and the rejection of violence against non-Muslims, while Muhammad was ruled by and lived under the political power of non-Muslims. The Medinian Revelations were made when Muhammad had seized power for himself in Yathrib, henceforth Medina, revealed his true face, rejected peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims, and commanded as an urgent obligation that all Muslims are to wage war against all non-Muslims, until the non-Muslims either submit to a slavery called Dhimma, as subjects and the common property of the Muslim Community, or convert to Islam.

Taha advocated that the Medinian Revelations be rejected and that a Reversion be made to the prior, Meccan Revelation. Such a suggestion Militates against Orthodox Islam, and he paid the price by being arrested, tried and being executed as an Apostate. He was and is not alone: Over the centuries from the lifetime of the False Prophet Muhammad, hundreds and thousands of men and women have been murdered throughout the world by Muslims and by Muslim States and Governments for saying or suggesting the same thing.

Ahmed Hussein Harkan is an Egyptian Muslim, who had been raised a fundamentalist, and who, from 2010 to 2020, had been an Atheist after rejecting Islam as inhuman. After years of severe persecution, imprisonment and harassment, in late March 2020, he announced his return to Islam. Harkan famously asked, a poser that no one has ever refuted, "What has ISIS (Daesh) done that Muhammad did not do?" ISIS / Daesh and Al Qaida are ultra-ultra Muslims, more Ultra than the Saudis or Deobandis, and look to rigidly and literally do as Muhammad did, including as a rapist, robber, murderer, pederast, etc.

To illustrate his bigotry and malice, Mikkelson added this made-up Scenario: «If one is willing to ignore history, context, and actual practice when quoting scripture and other religious texts, followers of just about any religion can be painted as uniformly fanatic and intolerant. By presenting misinterpretations and fringe activities as the norm, one could claim that mainstream Christianity tolerates or promotes child molestation and stoning and could recast the piece quoted above as follows:

«The minister gave a great presentation of the basics of Christianity, complete with a video. After the presentations time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn I directed my question to the minister and asked: “Please, correct me if I’m wrong, but I understand that in Exodus 35:2, the Bible instructs Christians to kill everyone who works on the sabbath: ‘Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you an holy day, a sabbath of rest to the Lord: whosoever doeth work therein shall be put to death.'"

«There was no disagreement with my statement.

«I responded, "So, let me make sure I have this straight. God has commanded Christians to kill everyone who works on Sunday, even Muslims and other non-Christians?"

«The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just gotten caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He sheepishly replied, "Yes."

«I then said, "Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Prophet Muhammad commanding all Muslims to kill those of your faith for not observing the Muslim sabbath."

«The minister was speechless.

«I continued, "I also have problem with your Bible commanding all Christians to stone to death anyone who criticizes your God, as detailed in Leviticus 24:16. Let me ask you a question... Would you rather have your God who tell[s] you to kill me in order to go to heaven or my Allah who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and wants you to be with me?"

«You could have heard a pin drop as the minister hung his head in shame.»

This statement is falls under British Indian law, and the laws of the Republic of India, against insults to the religious faith of a person or a group, and so, I advise and suggest that Christian activists take this up and have a case registered against David Mikkelson and Snopes.com for slandering, libelling, calumniating, misrepresenting etc Christianity, insulting the Christian religion, and that they be tried and be punished for these crimes.


Lucio Mascarenhas. 22nd Nov 2020. https://www.vaticaninexile.com

Sources: https://www.rickmathes.net/2014/09/25/allah-or-jesus
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/allah-or-jesus
https://www.truthorfiction.com/infidels
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/feb/11/chain-email/barbary-wars-did-us-declare-war-islam
https://americasfreedomfighters.com/thomas-jeffersons-response-to-muslims-in-1801-is-exactly-what-we-need-today
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Mohammed_Taha
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Harkan

Why Is Vaughn Treco Pulling His Punches On "Another Spirit"?

"Two Opposite Spirits in the Church," as remarked upon by "Father" Vaughn Treco

By Lucio Mascarenhas, 8th December 2019. Rewritten June 8, 2020.

Recently, I saw, and commented, on "Fr" Vaughn Treco's sermon of Nov 2018 titled, "The Fathers' Grapes and the Children's Teeth," that got him "excommunicated" April 1, 2019.

In that Sermon, Treco had stressed that "Popes" John 23-2 and Paul6 had explicitly "opened the doors... to a new spirit," a spirit that is distinctly and definitely not the same Spirit that Jesus had promised "unto the end of time," and had sent down, at Pentecost.

WHAT I WRITE here, will make no sense at all, unless you listen to, or better still, read Treco's sermon, and note, and digest, his urgent contrast between the Spirit of Catholicism, and the "Spirit Of Vatican2." Read Treco's sermon here: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/4247-vatican-revolution-diocesan-priest-s-had-enough.

Alternative: https://archive.is/mEhk1

Treco says: «John XIII said at the opening of the Council... and Paul VI reminded everyone at the Council as he brought it to a close... that it was their express will to unleash a new Spirit into the Church by way of the Council.... A spirit which they each affirmed in their own way would be unlike the Spirit of Catholicism which had preceded it!

«I have come to the realization that the effort (to reconcile the Spirit of Catholicism with the "Spirit of Vatican2") can no longer be made with integrity!»

However, this point that Fr Treco mentioned, while being true, begs further elaboration, which Fr Treco delicately refuses to do, PULLING HIS PUNCHES. It is not difficult to see why.

Fr Treco has effectively joined the Ambiscamnists, a "Traditionalist" sect where the implications of elaborating on "...a different spirit" would not be welcome; and which would militate against the stand Fr Treco has chosen to stand on: "I will recognize, and Resist!" (#RNR). Fr Treco says he recognizes the "Vatican2 Popes," and rejects Sedevacantism.

But Catholicism itself is not coy about this question, but boldly takes that to its logical conclusion: Jesus sent His Holy Ghost, the Third Person of the Triune Godhead, as Soul and Guide, of His Church, for all time. And, there can be no other Spirit welcome in His Church, but any other Spirit is from Satan, any other Spirit is Satan."

Also, against Treco I affirm with the Vatican Council, 1869-1870, that "Peter never betrayed Jesus after his Institution as Pope, and it cannot be Peter that brings in a strange, foreign Spirit into the Church." Indeed, Treco, in his sermon, openly contradicts the authoritative and doctrinal "Pastor Aeternus" of the Vatican Council, 1869-1870!

"Pastor Aeternus" has formally and infallibly taught:

1. "Has always kept the true Religion unsullied." (213.4)



2. "That the faith can suffer no Diminution here." (216.3)



3. "In its faith, the whole, true and perfect security of the Christian religion resides." (213.5)



4. "Because of its greater sovereignty, it was always necessary for every church to be in agreement with the Roman Church." (204.5)

The inescapable conclusion from Treco's sermon, is that there is a strict and unavoidable obligation to flee from the "Vatican2" sect, its Antipopes, it's Foreign, Demonic Spirit.

"Thus saith the Lord: 'Stand ye on the ways, and see and ask for the old paths which is the good way, and walk ye in it: and you shall find refreshment for your souls.' And they said: 'We will not walk.' And I appointed watchmen over you, saying: 'Hearken ye to the sound of the trumpet.' And they said: 'We will not hearken.'" (Jeremias vi, 16-17).

"Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore, 'Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.'" (2 Corinthians vi, 14fl). Amen. Return to Catholicism, to the Catholic Pope, to His Holiness Pope Michael1. — Lucio Mascarenhas.


LUCIO MASCARENHAS confesses the lawful Catholic Vicar of Christ, Pope Michael I, elected 1990, and as found at https://www.vaticaninexile.com

Fr Vaughn Treco, Excerpts from Sermon, Nov 25, 2018,

«For Pope John XIII said at the opening of the Council... and Pope Paul VI reminded everyone as the Council he brought to a close... that it was their express will to unleash a new Spirit into the Church by way of the Council.... A spirit which they each affirmed in their own way would be unlike the Spirit of Catholicism which had preceded it! «2. Although it is exceedingly painful to say, I have come to the realization that... It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this "spirit" of the Council, with its opening to the so-called "modern world" in ambiguous texts unlike any that any previous Council had ever adopted, has caused a rupture within the Church.... Recognizing the problem with the Council's apparent departure from Catholic tradition, Pope Benedict XVI made a valiant effort to propose what he called a Hermeneutic of Continuity or Reform (Note: "A reform of the reform," intended to approximate back to Pre-Conciliar Catholicism). THAT IS, a way of interpreting the teachings of the Second Vatican Council so that they can be embraced together with the infallible teachings of the councils and Popes which came before.... At this point, the thoughtful Catholic should ask himself: Why should it be necessary to try to reconcile the teaching of one Council with all other councils that came before it? This had never happened before in the history of the Church! I have come to the realization that this effort can no longer be made with integrity!» He opened the door of the Catholic Church to other religions and also to the world. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/John_XXIII "We were all made in God's image, and thus, we are all Godly alike." (Sources: 1. Canonisation of Blessed John Paul II and Blessed John XXIII, The National Catholic Church of the United Kingdom and Ireland, 4 July 2013, archived from the original on 7 April 2014 2. Gormley, Beatrice (26 September 2017). Pope Francis : the people's pope. New York: Aladdin. ISBN 148148141X. OCLC 973067191) In November 2003, Michael Novak describes what has been called the "spirit" of the Second Vatican Council as something that: "Sometimes soared far beyond the actual, hard-won documents and decisions of Vatican II.... It was as though the world (or at least the history of the Church) were now to be divided into only two periods, pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II. Everything 'pre' was then pretty much dismissed, so far as its authority mattered. For the most extreme, to be a Catholic now meant to believe more or less anything one wished to believe, or at least in the sense in which one personally interpreted it. One could be a Catholic 'in spirit'. One could take Catholic to mean the 'culture' in which one was born, rather than to mean a creed making objective and rigorous demands. One could imagine Rome as a distant and irrelevant anachronism, embarrassment, even adversary. Rome as 'them.'" (Michael Nowak, 24 November 2003, "Introduction to The Open Church (Millennium Edition)". American Enterprise Institute.)

The Madman's Lockdown #MadmansLockdown

I have been silent too long, I can be silent no more, in the face of the horrendous suffering of millions

By Lucio Mascarenhas, May 26, 2020.

The SARS-Cov2 or 2020 Corona-virus Pandemic had first come into India in Jan 2020. Indian merchants and students have been regularly travelling between India and Communist China, including to WuHan City, where the Pandemic allegedly originated. Between Jan 2020 and late March 2020, the Indian Federal Government of Narendra "Blundermore" Modi was busy with its usual criminal shenanigans and took no action against the Pandemic. Blundermore woke up suddenly in late March 2020 after Chief Ministers of most provinces had begun implementing partial lock-downs. It is in Blundermore's nature that he cannot bear to be upstaged, even if it is only in his imagination, in his delusions, and that he has to show his alleged superiority by outdoing others who may pose a challenge to him. The spectacle of Chief Ministers of the Provinces ("States," the legal technical term is "Pradesh" or Province) "upstaging" him provoked Blundermore to a precipitate, extreme lockdown, at 4 hours notice.

When the Lock-down was proclaimed, I had denounced it as being Extremely Stupid, Counter-productive, an action that will not save, but which will directly result in the death of millions of Indians, as I will presently explain why I fear and believe that that will ensue. Since then, the Lock-down has been extended to its 4th iteration, as of today, while Millions of the most poor having faced a callous and outright abusive police, state, and authorities, voted with their feet by walking hundreds and thousands of kilometres home, mocking Blundermore in the Greatest Exodus that humanity has yet seen. No amount of state repression and the usual Chicanery by Blundermore and his Thugs has been able to end this #GreatExodus. This Great Exodus, however, was not something I had foreseen, and is not the subject of this write-up.

When the initial partial lock-downs were imposed by the majority of Chief Ministers of the Provinces, I had stated that the most urgent need is not a blind lock-down and curfew, but mass mobilization by the state and provinces to meet the lacunae in the health care system, the need to collect, train, organise, and field volunteers on an urgent basis to make up the enormous gaps in the Indian health care system, to ensure the least possible toll of death from the coronavirus.

After I had made those arguments, I saw a news article, one of the rare truthful news in the media dominated by the baleful, malevolent influence of Blundermore, that he and his government were advised by scientists and experts that the best course to follow was to organise to close the gaps in the health care system, a suggestion that was ignored. (See Smoke, Mirrors and Modi: A Grand Illusion of Governance, by Samar Halarnkar

«A virus may not provide advance notice before striking. In this case, India did get early warning but did not do enough. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was being sparse with the truth on April 14, when he said India started checking passengers for the virus before its first known case on January 21. By that day, as Factchecker.in reported, only three airports had begun screening passengers (four more started on that day), and then only travellers from Hong Kong and China, although 20 countries had reported infections.

«Despite warnings from its top medical research body that a lockdown alone would, at best, reduce peak infections on a given day by 40%, Modi’s government ignored for a month – as journalists Nitin Sethi and Kumar Sambhav Srivastava reported (here and here) for www.article-14.com – advice from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) to urgently launch other interventions.

«These included door-to-door supplies of food and other essentials to the poor; district-wise infection monitoring; "fast reporting" to identify and quarantine infective clusters; mass quarantines for those in densely populated areas; and a rapid increase in hospital beds and intensive-care unit.

«"This discussion has gone on for too long and no action has been taken," Naveet Wig, member of the Prime Minister's Covid-19 Task Force and the head of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Department of Medicine said in leaked proceedings of an internal meeting on March 29. "No. No. We will have to tell the truth."»

See also: https://scroll.in/article/962223/six-reasons-why-the-modi-government-is-singularly-responsible-for-indias-worst-ever-migrant-crisis.

Blundermore's own government had drawn attention of the Provinces that 1.3 million people potentially exposed to the Coronavirus had travelled abroad and returned and need to be screened for the virus. Against that need, the Indian state and provinces had struggled to test people for the virus, not reaching even 10,000 by end of April. There was an urgent need to vastly ramp up testing and to identify and isolate infected persons. Instead, due to the Madman's Lockdown, the scale of testing not only could not be ramped up but actually slowed down, ground down. The Indian State lost track of this 1.3 million people who had traveled and returned from overseas. The nature of the SARS Coronavirus 2019 is that many infected persons are what is called "Asymptomatic," in that they only carry the germs but do not suffer themselves any illness, any ill effects, do not fall sick. These people cannot be known by being looked at, as being ill, and they can interact with others and spread the germs. They are also called "Super Spreaders." How many of the 1.3 million are Asymptomatic and Super Spreaders? No one knows. The 1.3 million are now no longer relevant, as the germs have already in the meantime spread far and wide in the Indian population. The Madman's Lockdown only gives a false sense of security, putting a blanket over the threat of the Pandemic spreading and wiping out millions in India, it has by no means stopped the actual spread of the virus.

As the Indian State has failed to grapple with the virus, to identify and to isolate the infected, the virus is spreading slowly but steadily. Under pressure from the Great Exodus, Blundermore has cynically opened up the railways, but at higher than usual costs, even as he blatantly lied that he had waived 85% of the train fare - not only did he not discount the usual fare, but he actually added surcharges on it! He has also, in the face of opposition from the Provincial Governments, done away with the requirement that their permission is needed to enter those provinces / states. The provinces themselves have recorded spikes in the infection count due to incoming migrants. Transported on crowded trains with minimal and very often illusory testing to exclude those infected, these crowded trains are ideal for spreading the virus further.

The greatest test, however, is still to come. The rains, the Southwest Monsoons, are about 1-2 fortnights away. With the rains come colds, fevers, sniffles, sneezes, and more. It will be very difficult to differentiate the Coronavirus from the normal Common Cold that usually catches hold of people during the rainy season. That is the time when the Coronavirus will most ideally spread like a wildfire around the billion plus strong population of India, and will wreak havoc, killing in millions. Everything else will pale in comparison. It is possible that this Dire prognostication may never come true, but everything logically points to it. Coronavirus has not been checked and eliminated due to the Madman's Lockdown, it has merely been swept under the carpet. It will not stay under the carpet as the Monsoons get into full swing.

Another danger staring India in the face is that of the disruption to Agriculture due to the Madman's Lockdown, which can very easily cause a mass failure of crops, the failure to cultivate and to harvest, leading to famines and starvations that will make the Great Bengal Famine that the English and Winston Churchill created during World War II pale away into insignificance.

There is an Indian fable of a king and his pet monkey. The monkey was very clever and very devoted. The king came to distrust his guardians, dismissed them and instead appointed his pet monkey his guard, dressed up in a smart uniform and armed with a sword. One day, as the king slept, a fly began to bother him. The monkey shooed away the fly then began to chase it around the room. The fly settled on the sleeping king's face. The monkey drew his sword, crept stealthily and struck at the fly to be rid of it once and for all. As can be expected, it was the king that died. That monkey is Blundermore. Fools and imbeciles have entrusted the lives and fortunes of a billion plus souls into the hands of this vicious malefactor, a man consumed by hatred and malice and by a Prima Donna Complex, and it is his irrational reaction to the Pandemic that imposed the most severe lockdown in the world. One reaction we are already seeing right now is the piteous spectacle of old and young men and women, carrying, dragging, young children and very old people, sometimes carrying their pets, trudging hundreds and thousands of kilometres home, the Great Exodus, the People of India Voting against the Baleful Blundermore and his tendentious lies by their feet, a truth that his #EVMFrauds cannot convert into another Lie. However, the worst is yet to come, and that will be in soon enough, in the next few months, as the Southwest Monsoons sweep over the Indian Peninsula and converts the Pandemic into a roaring wildfire that will consume millions.

There is still time. Blundermore and his entire Kleptocracy, including the BJP, and his subverted, domesticated Supreme Court and Judiciary, his #Presstitute Media, the Police, and Subverted State, need to be swept away, just as the Communist Party was swept away and cast away into the trash cans in the former Soviet Union, and mass mobilization of volunteers, training and deployment of volunteers must be done on a war footing to save lives, stave off the Pandemic, minimise the damage, the loss of lives, the threat of hunger and famine, from the Indian Peninsula. #TakeOutTheTrash #EndBlundermore #NoMore.


Lucio Mascarenhas, May 26, 2020
"Nothing changes, nothing can and should allow to change the focus of truth — the fact that Narendra Modi was and is, from his earliest years, brainwashed by the Sangh, with spectacular success, into being a Monomaniacal Psychopath, on the level of the Caliphs, Genghis Khan, Timurlane, Cromwell, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao Tse Dong, the Kims of North Korea, Idi Amin, Bokasso, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, etc., with a Pathological hatred of humanity, a Base Low Cunning, and an Agenda to bring down destruction upon millions, if not hundreds of millions; and that only the total, ruthless uprooting, eradication, of the RSS, BJP, the Sangh Parivar, and of all its Fellow-Walkers, is urgently needed for the Safety of all Humanity."

Basalism

Basalism: Another Way To The One World Religion of Vatican2, John-Paul2, Francis, etc.

From Catholicism to Panreligionism, the One World Religion, via the BEC BCC SCC SHC engine

By Lucio Mascarenhas, May 16 - May 20, 2020.

UNDER the pretence that the Parish as a unit of Church Government is too large and remote, and therefore logistically infelicitous for the purposes of crafting lively communities, a movement was given shape to, in Brazil and Spanish Latin America, called the "Base Communities" or "Base Ecclesial Communities" (BEC). A careful study of the "movement" shows that it was not a spontaneous movement from amongst Catholic peoples but that it was created by priests and Bishops who were and are Apostates from Catholicism, who are Modernists, Communists, and Marxists. The meaning of "Base" that was used, meant and means "Proletariat" or the Marxist pretension of a "Class" that is the Poorest of the Poor. Only the Branding was new. "Base Churches," then, meant "Proletarian Churches," or "Churches of the Proletariat," thus a criminal, treasonous, subversive, seditious, overtly Communist political movement masquerading as a Catholic Devotional Movement! Communism and Marxism and Class Warfare were rebranded as a Catholic theological Movement, "Liberation Theology"! The "Base Church Movement" was an attempt by Marxists to inject the Marxist-Communist plan variously called Communitarianism, Communardism, Collectivism, Kibbutzism or Sovietism, of Communal Communities, into the Catholic Church, even before the Modernist Coup and Usurpation of October 1958.

This movement must be seen in context. Particularly after the "French Revolutions," various movements arose among Catholics, inspired by the proto-Communist movements, by Socialism, Communardism, and generally spearheaded by apostate priests and bishops. The Sillon Movement in France was a precursor which the Catholic Popes squashed. The legacy of the Apostates, Maranos, and Freemason traitors and agents of the ZOG "Solve et coagula" programme administered by their remote and ultimate Owners, the Deicides through their principal puppets the WASPs from General HQ London, such as Simon Bolivar, Bernardo O'Higgins, Augustin Iturbide, Pedro Bragança, Manuel Belgrano, Joseph Saint Martin, Emilio Aguinaldo, etc., proved a fertile ground for Marxist and Communist inspired movements. Bishop Carlos Duarte Costa in Brazil was an infamous Communist, and when he was taken to task by the Catholic Popes, he split and formed his own schismatic, heretic, and pro-Communist, sect. During the Japanese occupation of the Philippines, Catholic Priests took up arms in the name of Communism, and continued fighting as the Communist Huk terrorists for decades, during the presidencies of Ramon Magsaysay and Ferdinand Marcos, slowly dissipating as the Soviets and Mao Tse Dong split, and as the Soviet Union declined and then died. Catholic Priests and Bishops played critical and even active military roles in Communist terrorism in Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Peru, "Bolivia" (Alto Peru), Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, etc. from the 1920s and ongoing even to this day. Basalism was born in and out of this same Communist wave infecting Latin America at the same times.

The Latin American Communist manifestations of "Liberation Theology" and of Basalism, are the equivalent of the "Naxalwadi" or Naxalite Movement in India!

The Apostate Heresy of Modernism, which originated in Protestant academic circles over the last 500 years, and which, over the last 300 years made strenuous efforts to infiltrate and take-over the Catholic Church, in which it succeeded in October 1958, teaches PanReligionism, or a "Unification of all religions into a One World Religion," and under its impetus, "Basalism" too turned from its foiled Communist-Marxist World Revolution objectives to the open and blatant Promotion of Apostasy and of PanReligionism, of the One World Religion.

In response to the Communist and constitutionally Anti-Catholic "Base Church Movement", I affirm that am not a Collaborator with these Satanists who formally teach that all religions are true, all gods are one, one can attain salvation through any religion or "god" etc.

The Apostate Church made many efforts to further "Basalism" from being a phenomenon confined to Latin America and the Philippines, to spread it worldwide, under the names of "Basic Christian Communities" and "Small Christian Communities," and it has become now rife worldwide, under those names. However, the Apostate Modernist sect never loses its focus on its final objectives, which is to first spread the Disease of "Basalism" worldwide, and then to use it as a tool and a means to spread PanReligionism, or the One World Religion Movement, for which the Apostate Heresiarchs Karol Wojtyla ("John-Paul2") and Jorge Bergoglio ("Francis") more than others have made "heroic efforts" to, so as to engender, bring about, inaugurate, the Kingdom of the Antichrist.

In South Asia "Bishop" Bosco Penha" was tasked with introducing Basalism, by the Modernist Apostate Antipopes in the Vatican. In 1980, he organised a Synod of Priests to push this agenda, but it began to progress only in 1984. Penha has done a phenomenal job. The mantle in Bombay has now been taken over by the "Conservative" bishop Barthol Barretto. The Objectives never change: Driving forward the the De-Christianisation of former Catholics, moving forward to the One World Religion, the Kingdom of the Antichrist.

The next significant breakthrough was achieved by "Fr" Edwin M. John, of the Diocese of Kottar, including the city of Nagercoil. Edwin coined a new Tamil word, "Ampiam," meaning "Community of Love," from the Tamil Word Anpu, Love. The Base Churches are therefore called Anpiams or Anpiyams. Today, at over 69 years of age, Edwin is posted by his Diocese as Director of the "Neighbourhood Community Networks," (NCN), the name he gives as the English form of his Ampiams. He developed his NCNs or Anpiams as PanReligionist bodies, mixing into Christianity the errors of the Hindu Pagans and of the Mahomettan Infidel Pagans! His sect has adopted this as the "Nagercoil Model" and implemented it in Northern Areas of West Bengal province, India, which includes South Sikkim, and also in Sikkim proper / North Sikkim, successfully bastardising the already destroyed Christian faith of former Catholics in the region.

Some extracts from the Word of God on "Inter-Religious Dialogue," "Inculturation," "Ecumenism," and Panreligionism:

• Exodus 23: 24 "Thou shalt not adore their gods, nor serve them. Thou shalt not do their works, but shalt destroy them, and break their statues."
• Leviticus 18: 4 "You shall not do according to the custom of the land of Egypt, in which you dwelt: neither shall you act according to the manner of the country of Chanaan, into which I will bring you, nor shall you walk in their ordinances."
• Leviticus 20: 23 "Walk not after the laws of the nations."
• Deuteronomy 7: 25-26: "Neither shalt thou take to thee any thing thereof, lest thou offend, because it is an abomination to the Lord thy God. Neither shalt thou bring any thing of the idol into thy house, lest thou become an anathema, like it. Thou shalt detest it as dung, and shalt utterly abhor it as uncleanness and filth, because it is an anathema."
• Deuteronomy 12, 29-32: "When the Lord thy God shall have destroyed before thy face the nations, which then shalt go in to possess, and when thou shalt possess them, and dwell in their land: Beware lest thou imitate them, after they are destroyed at thy coming in, and lest thou seek after their ceremonies, saying: As these nations have worshipped their gods, so will I also worship. Thou shalt not do in like manner to the Lord thy God. For they have done to their gods all the abominations which the Lord abhorreth, offering their sons and daughters, and burning them with fire. What I command thee, that only do thou to the Lord: neither add any thing, nor diminish."
• Jeremias 10: 2 "Thus saith the Lord: Learn not according to the ways of the Gentiles."
• Hebrews 13: 9 "Be not led away with various and strange doctrines. For it is best that the heart be established with grace, not with meats; which have not profited those that walk in them."

In order to prove my points, I will cite a few documents: 1. An article published by the Bombay Archdiocesan magazine The Examiner, and written by Bosco Penha himself; 2. Excerpts from an article written by a "Fr" Gerry Proctor of Liverpool, an important member of the Core Teams pushing forward Basalism, and lastly, 3. Citations from the work of "Fr" M John Edwin of Nagercoil city, Kanyakumari (Cape Comorin) in Tamil Nadu, India, as the "NCN" programme, and it's adoption and application in West Bengal and in the Indian Occupied Kingdom of Sikkim including the Darjeeling Hills or "New Gorkhaland" / "New Nepal" of South Sikkim in West Bengal province.

«January 1994, Article title: "From Basic Christian Communities to Small Christian Communities to Small Human Communities...." (Excerpt)
«In the wake of the Ayodhya incident and the sectarian conflicts following it, it is clear that Christians in India have the special task today of bringing peace and harmony into a country torn by religious strife. We, Catholics, must remind all concerned that the true role of religion is to bring the unconditional love of God into human affairs. More and more voices are heard asking that we move from "Small Christian Communities" to "Small Human Communities." The parish located in Jeri-Meri, Bombay, has shown that this is possible. Such "Small Human Communities" could act as models and catalysts of national integration. The journey winds on. We shall walk together, hand-in-hand....» (Source: Bishop Bosco Penha, Director of the "Small Christian Communities," Archdiocese of Bombay, in the official organ, the Examiner, 29th. January 1994. Reproduced at http://www.geocities.ws/prakashjm45/bccsccshc.html).

(There is only one true Religion, Catholicism. All other religions are false, man-made, Demonically-inspired caricatures of God's Truth. "All religions" very certainly DO NOT teach the exact same thing. False religions do not teach the love of the true God, and the means He mandates for the salvation of souls. Christianity does NOT possess from God a mandate to make the whole world a better place. Christianity has a mandate from God to preach the truth that this Earth is a transistional place, not our permanent home, that we are here to cooperate with God's Grace for our Salvation, that there is no Salvation outside of Jesus Christ and outside of His Guaranteed Catholic Church.)

Excerpts from "A Commitment to Neighbourhood: Base Ecclesial Communities in Global Perspective," by "Fr" Gerry Proctor. Source: https://smallchristiancommunities.org/a-commitment-to-neighbourhood

«Bishop Thomas Dabre of Vasai, India, during a presentation to an international audience at Cochabamba, Bolivia at the close of the last millennium made reference to the unique situation of Asia and its consequences for the mission of the Church:

«"Small Christian and Ecclesial Communities are possible in homogenous settings, when all profess the one Catholic faith. Both Catholic and non-Catholic Christians are about 2% of the total population of India. The evangelising mission of the Church and the actual multi-religious and multi-cultural setting of India demand that the small Christian communities should be open to become basic human communities including people of different faiths."

«This discussion was taking place especially in the Indian context where a number of theologians had reflected that in order to be genuinely authentic within the challenge of India's multi-faith reality the SCCs must reject the older model of BECs coming out of the Catholic majority countries of Latin America and forge their own style of basic community that responded to the situation of most Indian people:

«"The Christian communities in India should not be closed and exclusive communities. They must remain open communities where all people in each place, irrespective of religion, caste, creed and ideology, should be brought together and basic human communities to be formed."

«"The Church's objective in India must be the formation of basic human communities where common life-styles and common strategies for the liberation of the Indian masses and inter-religious approaches to the basic human problems and questions must be developed."

«Pathil sees the SCCs of India as 'only a first step towards the renewal of Christian life that should lead to the creation of basic human communities.'

«This stance is replicated throughout India as can be seen in the official Handbook of SCCs for the Archdiocese of Bombay:

«"The people of other faiths living in the neighbourhood should also be invited for most of the programmes – the earlier the better.... Many activities can be undertaken jointly. Living in close proximity many common interests and concerns are shared. Every SCC should move towards becoming a Small Human Community. This has to be the end product of our efforts keeping in mind the context of India as a plurality of religions."

«Perhaps the foremost promoter of Basic Human Communities (BHCs) in India is Fr M. John Edwin from Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu. He is a practitioner and an exponent of the BHCs and has clarified how he saw them both emerging from and working alongside the SCCs. There are many similarities between them. Both are small-group oriented and territory-based. Just as the SCC is the Church itself in a given neighbourhood so the BHC is the nation itself in miniature in the neighbourhood. Both are committed to non-dominating styles of leadership and both are developing a participatory world. The guiding principle of them both is Subsidiarity, that whatever can be done at a lower level is done at that level and not at any level above it and the higher level only takes up those tasks that can not be handled at the lower levels. In a paper distributed to the IVth AsIPA General Assembly in 2006, he made it clear that BHCs are 'kingdom communities,' that the responsibility for 'building Basic Human Communities forms part of the core mission of the Church, that it is not an option but a contextual necessity arising out of the very cause that gives the justification for the very existence of the Church.' They are not in competition but are a structural tool for the realising of the kingdom. They are forums where the voice of the smallest and the least can be heard and shared, where actions that initiate a fairer and more just world can be instigated. They encourage a practise of dialogue at the grassroots of society and are forums where religious treasures can be shared and improvements to the neighbourhood planned and executed.

«This same perspective was found also in other writers such as K.C. Abraham who wrote, 'What we need today is a new generation of Hindus, Muslims and Christians who will recapture universal perspective and give shape to it in Basic Human Communities.'

«Astrid Lobo-Gajiwala offers an important reality check when she analysed the extent to which most SCCs had remained aloof from peoples of other faiths. She asserted that as SCCs started out as a ministry to and among Catholics they excluded other faith peoples from the beginning. The models and materials that had influenced India mostly have come from Latin America, Africa and the Philippines and these have as their context a Catholic-only focus and as far as both parishioners and parish clergy are aware, there is very little connectivity promoted through them with other faiths.»

A pagan "Godman" effusively praises and extols Edwin's "Nagercoil Model" of the Anpiams or "Neighbourhood Community Networks": http://www.ssy.org/inner.php?id=44

The Paganisation of the already De-Christianised "Christians" via the MJ Edwin "Anpiam Model" or the "Nagercoil Model" in West Bengal and Sikkim - a worldwide program of progressing the Great Modernist Apostasy begun 1958 and formally adopted by "Vatican2" Latrocinium 1962-1965 https://smallchristiancommunities.org/promoting-neighbourhood-human-communities-nhcsbasic-human-communities-bhcs-in-west-bengal-sikkim-region-india.

Some Excerpts:

«Keeping in mind the mandate of the Church, “prudently and lovingly, through dialogue and collaboration with the followers of other religions, and in witness of Christian faith and life, acknowledge, preserve, and promote the spiritual and moral goods found among these [people], as well as the values in their society and culture"»

«"All the faithful and every Christian community are called upon to practice dialogue" (SEB – Synodal Episcoporum Bulletin April 25, 1998).»

«The aim of NHCs is to promote neighbourhood communities with people of all religions and castes and thus to promote inter-religious harmony.»

Christianity has NO mandate to Dialogue, or Inter-Religious Harmony. Quite the opposite! Dialogue was invented by the Modernist Apostates as a means to achieve the Coalescence of all religions into a One World Religion, which is a Negation of Catholicism.

«Jesus took the initiative to start a Jewish-Samaritan dialogue, even though the Samaritan woman (John 4) was at first reluctant to converse with him because of her anti-Jewish prejudices.»

Jesus DID NOT Dialogue but He instead Preached, He flatly told the Samaritan wiman, "Salvation is from the Jews." That was the Very Opposite of Dialogue and of "being Ecumenical"!

«"Strategies used to tackle: Use of scriptures of various religions at the meetings." "Identifying marks of KPG/NHC: Based on the teachings of the sacred scriptures."» These are proofs of the MORTAL SIN of Panreligionism!


Lucio Mascarenhas, https://www.vaticaninexile.com.

MICHAEL PRABHU'S "CHARISMATIC RENEWAL" "MINISTRY"

By Lucio Mascarenhas, Sunday, May 17, 2020.

Michael Prabhu (George Michael, Mohan Mahesh Prabhu, Mohan Michael Prabhu) is a member of what calls itself the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" ("Movement for the Renewal of Charisms"), abbreviated as "CCR." He operates the "Metamorphose Ministry" based out of the "CCR" and in which he claims he is standing for, and defending "Catholicism" from Protestantism, etc. His original website is https://www.ephesians-511.net. Through, and with a Collaborator, Francis Sunil Lobo, he now also operates https://www.ephesians511blog.com. His each individual writing is tedious, tendentious and shows poor to non-existent technical and editorial skills. His new website tends to be easier to read, to an extent, due to the technical and editorial abilities brought to the table by his collaborator, Francis Sunil Lobo.

I, Lucio Mascarenhas, and he, Michael Prabhu, are Antithetical to each other, there is an immense and unbridgeable chasm between me and him. I stand for Catholicism as it always was, consistent, coherent, orthodox, therefore categorically and unconditionally and implacably exclusive of the Latrocinium of "Vatican2" as being something holistically un-Catholic, indeed, as something ("Vatican2”) being viciously anti-Catholic.

He claims to stand for "a (Vatican2) Hermeneutics of Continuity" "orthodox Catholicism," but his roots and standing is the Charismatic Renewal, which I have convincingly demonstrated, is the Protestant ideology of Pentecostalism that arose from Edward Irving, Samuel Coleridge, their Albury Hall Meetings, etc., which formed the "Catholic Apostolic Church" headquartered in Switzerland, then the Latter-Rain Movement, then the Pentecostal Movement, and then the Charismatic Renewal Movement, the last of which was NOT a spontaneous eruption in the "Catholic Church" as per the "Roncallian Mythology" which pretends that it was a Spontaneous eruption of the action of the "Holy Spirit" in response to the "prophetic call" of "Pope John XXIII-II" Joseph Roncalli but was in fact a Direct Import from Protestantism, from Pentecostalism, and that there are Anglican Charismatic Renewal, Baptist Charismatic Renewal, Methodist Charismatic Renewal, etc. and that the Nature of Catholicism is such that it cannot accept and adopt "movements" that originated outside the Catholic Church, for which reason they have invented the Blatant Lie that I call the "Roncallian Mythology."

It is the formal teaching of the Catholic Church that what has once been formally defined, cannot be negated. It can be qualified, but not negated. Formal teachings include the Dogma of Unity, in which the Catholic Church affirms that the secession and falling away of Schismatics, Heretics, and Apostates, of masses of people, did not impair or reduce the Unity that Jesus had prayed for; that the Catholic Church continued to maintain its absolute identity with the Church and Religion that Jesus founded and guaranteed and which He vivified with God the Holy Ghost, the Paraclete; that God's Church cannot adopt without changes any ideology or movement that originated outside itself; that no man, not even a Pope, or an Ecumenical Council, could negate teachings that were once promulgated. Yet this is precisely what "Vatican2” did, negating not only Catholicism but also every fundamental teaching of God in the Bible, principally, the First commandment, by directly and in open contradiction of the Word of God, affirming that the Deicides (who are called the Synagogue of Satan by Jesus in the Apocalypse of St John), Mahomettan Infidels, Heretics, Pagans, etc all truly and honestly sought and seek the one true God!

Between 1958, and 1967, the Apostates, Modernists, unleashed the so-called "Spirit of Vatican2" Latrocinium, Satan's Council, by which people were no longer ashamed to go to Heretics and Pagans and learn their Errors, and to bring these Errors back into the once but now only in Pretense, Catholic Church, but which is in fact Roman Protestantism, the Modernist and Panreligionist (One World Religion) sect!

Thus came into being a Satanism, a Blasphemy against God the Holy Ghost, the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal."

Michael Prabhu claims to be "against women priests" It is a fact that the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" began with a Protestant Woman "priest" praying and conveying the "Spirit" by the direct laying of hands!

It is Nonsensical, Hypocritical and Ridiculous for a man whose own roots are in Protestantism to pretend to a mantle of "Defending Catholicism from inroads of Protestantism"!

If Michael Prabhu wishes to be Consistent, he is obliged to reject and denounce the Charismatic Renewal as alien to Catholicism, but the man refuses to be consistent and prefers to be a Pharisee, a Hypocrite.

Tell me if and how I am wrong!


Lucio Mascarenhas, https://www.vaticaninexile.com

HOW MANY "HOLY SPIRITS" ARE THERE? WHICH "HOLY SPIRIT" IS THE ACTOR-OPERATOR OF THE CHARISMATIC RENEWAL?

By Lucio Mascarenhas, March 12, 2020.

God the Holy Ghost or God the Holy Spirit is the third person or "Hypostasis" of the Triune Godhead, the Most Holy Trinity.

Jesus Christ promised to send the Holy Ghost / Holy Spirit, and that He (the Holy Ghost) would abide with His Church into the end of time.

"And I will ask the Father, and He shall give you another Paraclete, that He may abide with you for ever." (John xiv, 16, https://drbo.org/chapter/50014.htm).

Yet Pentecostalisms, and its' spawns the "Charismatic Renewals," including Trevor Lewis' Jeevan Jal, or Potta and Muringoor and it's daughters, the 2 "Tabor Ashrams" in Kalyan, are premised on the Demonic Lie of the "Constantinian Shift" and the resultant "loss of the Holy Ghost" for nigh 1500 years until the Irvingites "rediscovered" it.

Spin it how you want, this is a negation of Catholicism, and of Jesus, that can't be spun away.

Spin it how you want, there is no way around the truth that the "Spirit" of the Irvingites, of the "Latter Rain Movement," of the Branhamites, of Pentecostalism and the Charismatic Renewals is not God, but is Satan, and that the "Charismatic Renewal movement" is absolutely irreconcilable with orthodox Catholicism.

Some "alleged Popes" who are actually formal Apostates, teaching the Heresies of Modernism and of Panreligionism ("One World Religion") are alleged to "legitimise" the Catholic Renewal."

Even a valid, legitimate Pope does not possess Authority to go against "What the Catholic Church has always formally taught" in the past, as the Magisterial "Consensus of Theologians" always and consistently taught.

For example, the Vatican Council, 1869-1870, taught in Pastor Aeternus.

«The Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter that by His Revelation they might make known new doctrine, but that by His assistance they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the Revelation, the Deposit of Faith, delivered through the Apostles.» (Pastor Aeterus)


Lucio Mascarenhas, https://www.vaticaninexile.com

CAN AND WILL SATAN LEAD YOU TO GOD?

By Lucio Mascarenhas. Monday, May 12, 2014.

The Bible says women can't be priests.

Jesus taught that He would give His Paraclete, God the Holy Ghost, to His Church, the Catholic Church, and He (the Holy Ghost) would be with His Church for all times.

Protestants, who seceded from Catholicism, claim that the Catholic Church lost the Holy Spirit more than a thousand years ago, particularly from the time of Emperor Constantine, who they claim "paganized" Christianity to create Catholicism, and that Catholicism has existed without knowing the Holy Spirit and being indwelled by the Holy Spirit. They claimed to have "restored" the Holy Spirit to "Protestant Christianity" (sic!).

The Bible says that those who disobey and depart in contumacy are to be considered as heathen and pagans. So, where does that leave Protestants, their "worship" etc., from the Catholic viewpoint?

The Catholic Church has always taught that schismatics, heretics, apostates and pagans, including the Deicide Jews, do not worship the True God, but that they distort the True God and worship these falsehoods, these distortions, and that their worship is rejected by God and is offered to Satan, the First Rebel, and so Catholics are strictly, on the pain of automatic excommunication, forbidden from taking part in Protestant rituals, liturgies and acts of worship.

Or, in a nutshell, Protestants worship Satan.

The Charismatic Renewal began when "Catholic" professors of the Duquesne University USA went to a Protestant "woman priest," attended a Protestant service presided over by a "womanpriest" and were prayed over and "imparted" the "Holy Spirit" by this "womanpriest." This is how the Charismatic Renewal began. It was brought to India by a Parsi Mr Minoo Engineer who married a Luz Maria, a Puerto Rican "Catholic" in the USA and who "converted" to the "Charismatic Renewal." This then developed in Kerala into the Potha Ashram, and Potha's branch near Bombay & Kalyan, Mount Tabor at Kamba and Raita villages.

A tree is know by its roots.

A lie cannot give birth to a truth.

What began from Satan and his lies and his pomps, waging war against Jesus Christ and His Church, can't end up as a defence and a vindicator of Jesus Christ and of His Church. The Appearance is a lie.

God in the Bible commands that those who would be saved should strictly have no part in it. He forbids the mixing of the good and of the evil. He forbids yoking with the Devil and those of the Devil. He commands us to flee from this Abomination.

"Touch not the unclean thing." Flee from this filth!


Lucio Mascarenhas, https://www.vaticaninexile.com

Charismatic Renewal: Worshipping Satan as the "Holy Spirit"

By Lucio Mascarenhas, Tuesday, Jun 28, 2011.

Today, the "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" has grown quite strong and gained in acceptance quite universally as being legitimate. In Bombay, these ideas are now more particularly spread by the Potta Ashram and its branch near Bombay, the Mount Tabor Ashram near the ancient city of Kalyan....

The Charismatic Renewal is a movement that began when some converts to Pentecostalism from mainstream Protestantism, decided against the usual practise of leaving their sects, and decided instead to continue within their present sects, effectively as subsects of their parent sects.

The first "Charismatics," as distinct from "regular Protestants," were the Lutheran, Anglican, Methodist, Baptist and Adventist Charismatics. In 1967, in the wake of the Great Apostasy of Vatican II, when Catholics ceased to be Catholics but began to follow Protestant trends, a group of teachers (Profs William Storey, Ralph Kiefer, Kevin Ranaghan, etc.) in a "Catholic" university, Duquesne (pronounced "Du-cain"), went to a Methodist Charismatic woman and Protestant "priestess" in a Protestant place of worship, and this woman "prayed" over them and "laid hands on them, conferring on them the Pentecostal/Charismatic 'Holy Spirit.'"

«In 1966, the discovery of Evangelical Pentecostal practice and teaching through the two Protestant books, 'The Cross and the Switchblade' and 'They Speak With Other Tongues' was examined closely by four Catholic laity in the Eastern United States. Ralph Keifer and William Storey of the faculty of Duquesne University in Pittsburgh and Steve Clark and Ralph Martin of the staff of an East Lansing, Michigan, parish began to meet to discuss not only the fascinating aspects of Pentecostal power as the two books related them, but their own personal Catholic faith as well. They came to the conclusion that there was something direly needed in the life of the Church as well, and that it had to be an experience with the Holy Spirit - which would "fill the void left by human effort" - that followed the direction of the radical new movement that was then beginning to take hold in mainline Protestant denominations, the charismatic movement. Certainly, the examples of the ministries of Protestant clergy like James Brown, David DuPlessis, and Dennis Bennett were in mind , as well as the compelling promise of a vitally defined and practiced faith. To them, this leap of faith might 'fill the vacuum left by human effort.' Their discussions became translated into a search for others who could help them articulate their longings for such an encounter.

«In January 1967, Keifer and Stoney attended an interfaith prayer meeting where they requested prayer to receive the Holy Spirit. While prayer with the laying on of hands was made on the behalf of Keifer, he began to speak in tongues after making 'an act of faith for the power of the Spirit.' His enthusiastic account of his faith's 'livening' eventually set off a chain of events that resulted in the birth of the 'Catholic Charismatic Renewal.' Prayer meetings were held in Pittsburgh, in South Bend, Indiana (at the home of Keifer's friends Kevin and Dorothy Ranaghan) and at the University of Notre Dame, where Clark and Martin (who had also received this 'baptism of the Holy Spirit') conducted with the Ranaghans a 'retreat.' This weekend retreat was unlike any other Catholic retreat, however: religious experiences were openly shared and open prayer was made for this 'baptism of the Holy Spirit' by the laying on of hands in prayer groups. Most of the individuals involved in these events left them profoundly changed by these 'infillings of the Spirit' - the change in their lives and their own testimonies began to spread word of the happenings.» (https://www.spiritwatch.org/firecath.htm (Anti-Christian website))

«In August of the year 1966, some lay Professors of the Duquesne University attended the Congress of the Cursillo Movement,... looking forward for a new experience and hoped to achieve the full power of Faith and wished to find it in this spiritual formation movement, which had just started after the Vatican Council II in Spain.... At the Cursillo Congress, they got acquainted with Steve Clarke and Ralph Martin, co-ordinators of student activities at St. John's Parish, East Lansing, Michigan. It all began for them with the reading of two books, "The Cross and the Switchblade" by David Wilkerson, an autobiographical story of a Protestant Pastor who was led by strong inner impulses to abandon the life of a salaried Parish Minister and embark on a dangerous mission to the delinquents and drug addicts of Brooklyn in neighbourhoods, into which the average American would not venture at night, or even by day for that matter. The 2lst chapter of the book was, "The Baptism in the Holy Spirit" which formed and penetrated the hearts of the readers. The Duquesne Professors found what they had been missing in other movements. At this time one of the organizers of the meeting was Ralph Keifer who came across a book on Pentecostalism by John Sherrils which was titled, "They speak in other tongues" which became the source book, for those who had gathered for the meeting.

«In the fall of the same year, this group met again for a period of deeper prayer and in it, "Come Holy Spirit" was recited and an important place was given to the Holy Spirit. Since these Catholic laymen wanted more clarification on the topic, some approached the Pentecostals, despite the somewhat repute of their doctrinal beliefs. W. Lewis an Episcopalian Priest, put this group in touch with a woman involved in Charismatic Movement. In January 1967, an invitation was given to them to attend a prayer meeting on January 13th, which was the day of the Baptism of Our Lord. At that meeting more anxious doubts arose at the way things were done. Ralph was confused by the prayer meeting. No doubt, he was positive about the high level sharing and lively theology, but his intellectual mind was scandalized at the literal interpretation of the Scriptures and the idea of direct communication with God. Out of these four who attended the meeting, only Ralph returned the following week, but had brought with him another Professor of Theology, Patrick Bourgeois and at the end of the meeting, the two men asked to receive the Baptism in the Holy Spirit. One group prayed on Ralph, imposing their hands and the other group on Patrick. Ralph was asked to make an act of faith for the power of the Spirit to work. He prayed in tongues rather quickly. Ralph and the group began to have some deep and wonderful experiences of prayer. The result of all this was to seek an interdenominational and quite informal prayer group, who had undergone the experience called "The Baptism in the Holy Spirit" (the Acts of the Apostles and I Cor Chpts 12-14 were read literally by this group). The follow-up was on 18th and 19th February 1967 where about twenty-five students and University theology professors from Duquesne University got together for a retreat weekend at the Ark and the Dove retreat house outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to study the Acts of the Apostles and consider the claims of the Pentecostals as described in the two books, "The Cross and the Switchblade” and “They speak with other tongues.” They were praying for a new Pentecost throughout the weekend.

«In the weeks that followed, the students gradually learned about the gifts of the Holy Spirit. They told their friends and colleagues about it and within a few months the Catholic Pentecostal Movement, as it was known then, had spread to half a dozen other campuses and within a few years, there were prayer groups and meetings all over America.» (https://www.jeevanjal.org/jeevanjal/origin-ccr.html AND https://www.bangalorewalla.com/ronnie.johnson/ccr.htm)

Catholics are strictly forbidden from participating in Protestant worship, and from receiving "sacraments" or "quasi-sacramental rites" from them, described as the crime of "Communicatio is Sacris," but which crime is touted as a "virtue" under the very same precise name by the Satanic Robber Council "Vatican II."

The Bible also very strictly forbids women from being ministers and celebrants of public Christian liturgy, forbidden women from being priestesses.

What was this "Holy Spirit" received by the Duquesne teachers? Is it the Holy Ghost, one of the three Persons of the Triune Godhead?

The Charismatic Renewal affirms that this is indeed so. However, a careful consideration of Catholic theology and of the roots and of the ideas that inspired the birth of the Charismatic Renewal in its original form, continued into the Charismatic Renewals themselves, bears witness otherwise.

We have seen that the Charismatic Renewal began as a direct continuation and offshoot, or "evolution" if you will, of Pentecostalism. And what is Pentecostalism?

Pentecostalism began in the early 1900s in the USA as a further development of what was the Latter Rain Movement. The Latter Rain Movement was one of the two successor movements of Irvingism, the other being the comparative formalistic Irvingite sect of "Catholic Apostolic Church" based out of Protestant Switzerland.

Irvingism is the development of the ideas of Edward Irving, a Scotch Calvinist or Presbyterian who was himself influenced by the ideas of a Chilean Jew or Marano Juan Josaphat Ben-Ezra, who had pretended to become a Jesuit priest, Father Manuel Lacunza-Diaz. Ben-Ezra's heretical books were formally excommunicated and banned by the Catholic Church, put on the Index of Prohibited Books.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Irving
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Lacunza

Ben-Ezra taught "that during the period before the 'day of the Lord' there would be a general apostasy of the Catholic Church which would make it part of the Antichrist. In this sense 'the church' was not individuals, but 'a moral body' composed of all the apostates and atheists. Naturally this view was especially controversial because it placed the official church on the wrong side in the final struggle between Good and Evil. It was this belief that finally brought about the Vatican's condemnation of his work."

Irving developed Ben-Ezra's teachings, combining with it the widespread Protestant canard of "Constantinianism" made against the Catholic Church, claiming that under the Emperor Constantine, the Church was seized and paganized by Constantine, and that the Church as a result, among other things, lost the presence of the Holy Ghost....

Irvingites presumptiously pretended that they, by their works and teachings, had "revived" the presence of the Holy Ghost in Christianity (or rather within Protestantism, to be more precise), and to re-introduce Christianity to the Holy Ghost and His Works.

On the contrary, it is a fundamental teaching that Jesus Christ founded His Church and safeguarded it as an institution in perpetuity, and guaranteed Her the indwelling of the Holy Ghost as a permanent feature, as Her very Soul, Her Animating Spirit, and that as such, the Catholic Church could never ever lose the presence of the Holy Ghost from her foundation to her end in the Parousia, the Return of Jesus Christ Himself.

Irving was assisted by a group of collaborators, the New Age of his day, including the Protestant English poet Samuel Coleridge.

This is the origins of the Charismatic Renewal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charismatic_Movement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Charismatic_Renewal

It is therefore obvious to any Catholic with common sense that the "Holy Spirit" of the Charismatic Renewal/Pentecostalism/Irvingism cannot be the same as God the Holy Ghost, any more than the Irvingite sect and "apostles" of the "Catholic Apostolic Church" can be the same as the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Roman Church founded by Jesus Christ under the primacy of Simon Peter or any more than that the Jesus Christ of the Bible and of Christianity can be the same as the Jesus Christ of the Quran.

And therefore, the necessary conclusion is that this "Holy Spirit" is none other than Satan himself, the Father of Lies, Beelzebub.

The Holy Bible warns us, "Whosoever revolteth, and continueth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that continueth in the doctrine, the same hath both the Father and the Son. If any man come to you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him, God speed you. For he that saith unto him, God speed you, communicateth with his wicked works" 2 John i, 9-11.

The Holy Bible also warns us, "...Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be accursed" Gal. i, 8-9.

Jesus warns in the Bible that the Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost is the one sin that cannot and will not be forgiven, and defined it as "attributing to God the work of Satan, and to Satan that what is the work of God." And so, the Charismatic Renewal is founded on the fundamental premise that the Work of God (the true Catholic Church slandered by Ben-Ezra, Irving, Vatican II, etc.) is really the work of Satan, and that the work of Satan (Irvingism, Pentecostalism, Vatican II, the Charismatic Renewal) is really the work of God.

There cannot be a more vile blasphemy than this.

The Holy Bible also warns us: "Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: and I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty" 2 Cor. vi, 17-18.

Let he who has ears hear; let he who has eyes read; let he who has sense understand. Flee from the abomination of damnation and return to Christ and His one true Church in His lawful vicar Pope Michael I (https://www.vaticaninexile.com).

As for the rest, eternal damnation....


Lucio Mascarenhas

Sources

https://ephesians-511.net
https://ephesians511blog.com
https://facebook.com/taborkalyan
https://facebook.com/groups/taborprayerhome
Glorify-god.com Melody Meneses, a "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" "pastor"
https://facebook.com/luz.engineer
https://spiritwatch.org/firecath.htm (Protestant, Anti-Christian website)
https://jeevanjal.org/jeevanjal/origin-ccr.html Trevor Lewis' website, makes very clear that the "Charismatic Renewal Movement" originated amongst Protestants
https://bangalorewalla.com/ronnie.johnson/ccr.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Ranaghan Kevin Ranaghan and his wife Dorothy Garrity were early converts to the newborn "Catholic Charismatic Renewal" and in 1969, published a book describing their experiences, tellingly titled "Catholic Pentecostals"!