Sunday, September 20, 2026

Matriarch Rebecca's Age At Marriage To Isaac


Islam's Desperate Lies Against Rebecca & Isaac, To Cover For Its #PedophileFalseProphetMuhammad! #WithoutLiesIslamDies 

According to the #HolyBible, #Genesis24And25, Isaac was 40 years old when he married Rebecca, his niece, daughter of his cousin Bathuel, granddaughter of Abraham's brother Nahor, & sister of Laban, & Isaac was 60 years old when his twin sons Jacob & Esau were born to Rebecca. 

Any person with half a brain will know, on reading Genesis 24&25, that Rebecca was not a 3 years old toddler, but was probably in her late teens or early twenties when she married Isaac. 

To expect #MahomettanInfidels to use brains, & be honest, is the same as expecting the sun to rise in the west!

Malicious Retards Of #Mahomettanism, #AlMuhamadiat, The Falsely So-Called "#Islam," #ReligionOfSubmissionToAllahAKASatanTheGreatestDeceiver, Maliciously Lie That #Isaac Was 99 Years Old (Or 40 Years Old, In A Fewer Versions) & #Rebecca Was 3 Years Old When They Married; 

Lies Designed To Shield, & To Deflect From, The #FalseProphetMuhammad, #ProphetOfPederasty, #ProphetOfThighingAndOfEjaculatingSpermAllOverPrepubescentBabies! #DeenAsAlWildanMukhalladun #LaylatAsAzZutt #MuhammadGotHimselfThriceHumpedByHinduJatsAllNightLong!

Retarded #MahomettanInfidels: "Rebecca, who drew water from a well for 10 camels, was 3 years old"!

«Every time someone points out that Muhammad married a 9 year old, Muslims hit back with the exact same comeback about the Bible. It sounds devastating. Until you actually open the text & read what it says!»

«Genesis 24 describes her walking to a well, carrying a heavy water pitcher, watering camels, & engaging in mature conversation, which implies she was a young woman rather than a small child!»

Sunday, August 02, 2026

The Clear Quran

The #ImpiousQuran Is A #BookOfContradictions, #AlQitabAsAlTanaqudat: The #Quran Is Sold & Hawked As The "#BookOfNoncontradictions." Indeed, It Boasts That No Contradictions And Or Errors Can Be Found In Itself, Touting That Claim As "Proof" Of Its "Miraculousness." 

Quran.com/4/82: "If It Had Been From Any Other Than Allah, It Would Have Much Contradictions!" 

However, When Examined, It Is Found To Be So Full of #Contradictions, It Outklutzes The Klutziest Of #Klutzes, Tripping All Over Its Own #TwoFeet With Its Blatant Contradictions! #TwoLeftFeet! #Klutz. #QitabAsAlKlutz. #DeenAsAlKlutzes. #IljamicLogic #IljamicScience #CatechismOfIljam #YouDontSeeHow? #ItsBecauseThatsWhy!
https://facebook.com/share/v/1EhjJBwKQh #TheClearQuranExceptNotAlwaysWaitMakeThatAMeaslyFew!

Monday, July 27, 2026

Was Jesus A Muslim When...


None of God's Prophets, Not Adam, Not Noah, Not Abraham, Not Moses, Not Joshua, Not David, None, Not One, Worshipped Allah, the Pagan Arab "god" Condemned By The God Of Abraham As A Devil In Psalm95v5 #PagangodsAreDevils & In 1Corinthians10v20 #PagansWorshipDevilsNotGod!
#IljamicLogic! #WithoutLiesIslamDies! #WithoutBullshitificationIslamDies!

«Was Jesus A Muslim When...
Muslims lie that Jesus was a Muslim because He fell on His face & prayed at Gethsemane (Matt 26:39). 

I ask:
1. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "I am the Son of God"? John 10:36;

2. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "I & My father are one"? John 10:30;

3. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "That all men should honor the Son as they honour the Father"? John 5:23;

4. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said He came "to give His life a ransom for many"? Matt. 20:28;

5. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "I am the Way, the Truth, & the Life, no man comes unto the Father but by Me"? John 14:6;

6. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "I am the Alpha & the Omega, the Beginning & the End"? Apoc. / Rev. 1:8;

7. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "All powers in heaven & on earth has been given unto Me"? Matt. 28:18;

8. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said, "Go & preach to all nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father, & of the Son, & of the Holy Ghost"? Matt. 28:19;

9. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "For God so loves the world that He gave His only Begotten Son so that whosoever believes in Him shall never perish"? John 3:16;

10. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "I Am the Resurrection & the Life, he that believes in Me, though he were dead, yet he shall live"? John 11:25;

11. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "I am the Bread of Life, he that comes to Me shall never hunger"? John 6:35;

12. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said, "I am the living water, whosoever drinks of the water that I shall give him, shall never thirst"? John 4:14;

13. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "Salvation is from the Jews"? John 4:22;

14. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "For the Son of Man will send forth His Angels & they shall gather out of His Kingdom…" (meaning Jesus is God)? Matt. 13:41;

15. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said that He will send the Comforter "But if I depart I will send Him unto you" (meaning Jesus is God)? John 16:7;

16. Was Jesus a Muslim when He "went unto them walking on the sea"? Matt. 14:25;

17. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "Lazarus, come forth!" John 11:43;

18. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "Heaven & earth will pass away but My word shall not pass away"? Matt. 24:35;

19. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said, "I have power to lay down My life & I have power to take it up again"? John:18;

20. Was Jesus a Muslim when He said "Repentance & remission of sin should be preached in His name"? Luke 24:47.»

Look At All These "Muslims"!
Look At All These "Muslims"!
Look At All These "Muslims"!
Look At All These "Muslims"!
Look At All These "Muslims"!
See, even Narendra Modi is a "Muslim"!
See, even Narendra Modi is a "Muslim"!
See, even Narendra Modi is a "Muslim"!

(Authorship & copyright to text within parentheses belongs to the original author, anonymous. I have proofed the text )


Lucio Joao Mascarenhas 

Friday, July 24, 2026

Kaaba: From Pagan Shrine to 'Monotheism'

«The Kaaba Or "Cube": From Pagan Shrine to "Monotheism" – A History of Fire, Destruction, & The Black Rock That Spent 23 Years in a Poop Tank! — By Obadia Emetiel: https://facebook.com/share/1J4o55tXUF

If Allah truly had a "house on Earth," then he must be the worst landlord in history—because the Kaaba has been burned, destroyed, rebuilt, stolen from, attacked, and rebranded more times than a failed business. And yet, despite all this, Muslims still perform the exact same pagan rituals that Arabs were doing before Islam even existed! [Contd.] 1. The Kaaba's Pagan Beginnings: Where It All Started! Before Muhammad, Arab pagans worshipped hundreds of gods. The Kaaba was just one of many temples in the region. 360 idols were placed inside the Kaaba, belonging to different tribes.

The Black Stone was considered a fertility idol. Women used to rub menstrual blood on it, & men touched it with their private parts to increase virility. Arab pagans circled the Kaaba 7 times, just like Muslims do today. Nothing changed. The only difference is that Muhammad removed the smaller idols and kept the biggest one! 2. Muhammad Captures Mecca & "Islamizes" the Kaaba (630 AD): Muhammad & his army storm Mecca, take over the Kaaba, & destroy 359 idols—but he keeps one. The largest idol, which stood on top of the Kaaba, was not destroyed—instead, Muhammad gave it all the names of the broken idols & rebranded it. The same pagan rituals (circumambulation, kissing the Black Stone, & running between Safa & Marwa) were kept but declared "Islamic." Even the "Sahaba" (Muhammad's companions) were confused & asked why they were following pagan customs. Muhammad's answer? "This is how Allah wants it!" 3. 683 AD – The Kaaba Burns Down for the First Time: Only 51 years after Muhammad's death, Mecca rebels against the Caliph. So what happens? The Umayyad army lays siege to Mecca. The Kaaba catches fire & burns to the ground. The Black Stone cracks. The roof collapses. Allah's house? Couldn't even survive its first century. 4. 692 AD – The Kaaba Gets Destroyed Again: Less than 10 years later, another civil war erupts. The Umayyads launch catapults at the Kaaba. Its walls collapse. The Black Stone shatters even more. When the war is over, the Umayyads rebuild the Kaaba—but change its shape again, proving that even Muslims couldn't agree on what the "holy house" should look like! 5. 930 AD – The Most Humiliating Moment: The Black Stone Stolen & Kept in a Septic Tank full of human shit for 23 Years! In 930 AD, a radical Islamic sect, the Qarmatians, attacked Mecca. They slaughtered thousands of Muslim pilgrims, dumped their bodies into the Zamzam well, stole the Black Stone & took it to Bahrain, mocked the Muslims, saying: "Where is your Allah to protect his house?" But here's the best part: They threw the Black Stone into a sewage tank and kept it there for 23 years! Muslims had no choice but to pray toward an empty cube! After two decades, the Abbasids paid a ransom to get the Black Stone back, but it was already broken into pieces. They glued it together & added extra stones to hold it together. Today, when Muslims kiss the Black Stone, they're actually kissing a broken rock that was stored in human shit for two decades! 6. 1258 AD – The Kaaba Gets Flooded & Neglected: By the 13th century, Islam was collapsing. The Mongols invaded Baghdad & wiped out the Abbasid Caliphate. Mecca was abandoned & the Kaaba was neglected. In 1269 AD, massive floods damaged it again resulting in another rebuild, another change to its shape & structure! 7. The Ottomans Take Over & Keep Altering the Kaaba: By the 1500s, the Ottoman Empire controlled Mecca. They renovated the Kaaba again after more floods. They added a silver frame to the Black Stone because the broken stone pieces kept falling apart. They reinforced the walls, basically making another version of the Kaaba! 8. 1979 AD – The Grand Mosque Seizure: Iranian Khomeinists Hold the Kaaba Hostage! Even in modern times, the Kaaba wasn't safe. In 1979, an armed group of Iranian Khomeinist terrorists seized the Kaaba & held it for two weeks. Saudi Arabia had to call in French commandos (non-Muslims!) to free it. Imagine needing European soldiers to save Allah's house! The Irony: The Kaaba is Just a Pagan Cube That Keeps Getting Rebranded. After all this, let's ask: If the Kaaba is so "holy," why did Allah allow it to be burned, bombed, flooded, stolen from, & destroyed multiple times? Why did the Black Stone, the "sacred gift from Allah," spend 23 years in a tank full of human shit & come back in pieces? Why do Muslims still follow the exact same pagan rituals from pre-Islamic times? The truth is simple: The Kaaba was a pagan shrine before Muhammad, & it still remains a pagan shrine today. It was repeatedly destroyed & rebuilt, each time erasing a bit more of its polytheistic past to make it look "monotheistic." The Black Stone is just a broken rock that was once covered in menstrual blood & kept in a toilet! And today, Muslims still march around the cube, kiss the glued-together Black Stone, & pretend it's "pure monotheism." If that's monotheism, then I'm the King of Jupiter!

Sources for Fact-Checkers:

•The Kaaba's Pagan History: Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah, Tabari's History of Prophets and Kings

 •Muhammad Destroying the Idols: Sahih Bukhari 2478, Sahih Muslim 1674

•The Qarmatian Raid & Black Stone Theft: Al-Masudi's Muruj adh-Dhahab, Ibn Kathir's Al-Bidaya wa'l-Nihaya. 

•Kaaba Fires & Attacks: Tabari's Tarikh al-Rusul wa'l-Muluk, Ibn Athir's Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh.

•Grand Mosque Seizure (1979): Thomas Hegghammer's Jihad in Saudi Arabia.

Everything here is historical fact. The Kaaba's history is a joke, and the joke writes itself!»


APPENDIX 
Source: Google AI
«The Kaaba has been rebuilt or repaired up to a dozen times, with its shape notably changing between a rectangle & a square. Originally built, allegedly by the Prophet Abraham, as an unroofed rectangular structure, it was altered to a smaller, roofed square by the Quraysh and later back to its full rectangular foundation by Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr.

The architectural shape & features of the Kaaba have undergone several major shifts throughout history:

•The Original Structure: Built as an open-air rectangle with the stone wall of the Hateem integrated as part of the structure.

•The Pre-Islamic Quraysh Reconstruction (circa 608 AD): Due to limited funds from lawful earnings, the Quraysh could not rebuild on the full foundation. They shortened the building, making it a square structure and leaving the Hateem (or Hijr Ismail) outside the main walls. They also added a roof, closed one of the two doors, & raised the remaining door high off the ground to prevent unauthorized entry.

•Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr's Reconstruction (683 AD): Following fire damage, he rebuilt the Kaaba strictly according to the original, longer foundation. This returned the Kaaba to its rectangular shape, lowered the door to ground level, & restored the 2nd door.

•Umayyad Reconstruction (693 CE): After further damage, Umayyad Caliph Al-Hajjaj demolished the extension added by Ibn al-Zubayr. He restored the structure to the smaller, cube-like square shape that the Quraysh had established. This square footprint has remained to the present day.

•Modern Renovations (1957 & 1996): Subsequent maintenance has focused on structural preservation rather than altering its shape. The 1996 renovation replaced the internal pillars, refreshed the mortar, and reinforced the foundation using modern engineering.»

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Sajid Rashidi On Shariah Law & Rapes

Iljamic Inbred Troglodyte Sajid Rashidi, "Ladkiyan shaadi karne main der karte hain, isliye unka rapes hota hain!" "Girls delay marrying which is why they get raped!"

«Maulana Mohammad Sajid Rashidi, President, All India (Sunni) Imams' Association, claims delayed marriages among girls contribute to rising rape cases. He also called for the implementation of Islamic Sharia law in India, saying it contains stricter provisions to deal with sexual crimes.»

How Does "Delayed Marriage" "Contribute to rising rape cases"? 

Does he mean, on the bald face of it, that women, young girls, go crazy, attacking, sexually assaulting, boys & men due to being sexually frustrated by "delayed marriage"?

We know from his further, clarifying, remarks, that that is not what he means, not at all!

Sajid Rashidi, in keeping with Islamic "norms," does not believe that girls and women have agency, the right to choose; he believes, as Iljam, Mahomettanism, teaches, that girls & women are passive, or more precisely "passively receptive" partners in sexual intercourse. 

This is Misogyny, pure & simple, & misogyny is the leading cause of sexual harrassments & assaults, on girls & women, even newborn baby girls, prepubescent girls, girls incapable of consenting. 

After all, a girl's consent is immaterial and inconsequential to Iljam!

Sajid Rashidi, as a matter of fact, made it clear, by his subsequent clarifying remarks, that "late marriages," "delayed marriages," deny boys & men access to "legitimate" sexual intercourse, causing boys & men (evidently, only those raised in that milieu) to "go feral," resulting in these "feral" boys and men, overthrown by the deliberate inculcation, cultivation, of Sexcrazedness, to indulge in forced, nonconsensual, sexual acts, harassments, rapes, Bachhabaazi, etc.! 

That is not the fault of girls and women. 

It is also not the fault of boys & men, though only in so far as, in India, boys & men have been brainwashed that girls & women are commodities, that their consent does not matter, that might is right, & whichever boy or man can "force," "coerce," a girl and or woman into submission, acquires & obtains "ownership" of her as her "owner," "proprietor," the central precept of 99.99% of UrduHindi Bollywood movies!

This is Iljam's Aggravated Misogyny. 

I have long stressed the fact that, according to Catholic theology & Canon Law, Mahomettanism Does Not Know And Therefore Cannot Have, And Is Absolutely Incapable Of Knowing, & Having, True Marriages, Sacramental, Indissoluble; Instead It Has Contracts Of Concubinage, Fornication, And Or Adulteries! 

A Muslim, qua a Muslim, is absolutely incapable of contracting a true marriage, even if they "marry" a Catholic in Church! 

Any "marriage," involving two, or even one party being a Mahomettan, is invalid, null and void, both by Natural Law and by Divine Law! 

Furthermore, according to Iljamic "Law", & consequently, according to Shariah Law, when a Mahomettan Infidel "marries" a NonMuslim already subsisting in a valid, undissolved, marriage, that previous marriage is "voided" & "superseded" by the new, Iljamic faux "marriage"! 

According to Catholic theology & Canon Law, the marriage of two Pagans (Bons, Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Zoroastrians, Sikhs, Unbaptized "Christians," etc., excluding Jews & Mahomettans) constitute a valid & indissoluble marriage in the Natural Law; the marriage of two baptized heretics or schismatics that are not "first generation ExCatholics" are, by limited "supplied jurisdiction," recognized, under sufferance, as a valid & indissoluble marriage in the Natural Law.

In India, Islam, Phallic & Misogynist, has, over the last 1400 years, penetrated deep, it had found Hinduism, already itself intensely Phallic & Misogynist, receptive and compliant, resulting in Hinduism conforming deeply to Iljamic norms, and as a result, thoroughly permeated the Indian mind & consciousness, a phenomenon that is the Syncretism, gloatingly called, by its Proponents, "#GangaJamunaTehzeeb"!

Iljamic norms & the overpowering Sexcrazedness of Iljam, thoroughly pervades, & deeply underlies, Indian Arts, most particularly, the Film Industry, beginning with, but not restricted to, "Bollywood," the UrduHindi wannabe & arriviste imitator of Hollywood. 

Does "Shariah Law" retard Sexual harassments, abuse, rapes, etc.?

Shariah is not a neutral system. Adoption of Shariah is contingent upon adoption of Iljam as the "only true & tolerable religion and ideology, exclusively mandated by Allah," both by the State & by the Populace. 

The call for the adoption of Shariah is therefore a backdoor attempt to force fullblown Iljam upon India. 

But Shariah is not Anti-Misogynistic. It is an integral part, an expression, of Iljam, which is possibly the most Misogynistic ideology in human history. 

As such, Shariah is itself integrally, acutely, extremely, Misogynistic. 

Shariah declares women are inferior to men. Shariah allows a man to have upto 4 "wives" at any given moment, besides an unlimited number of kidnapped NonMuslim women illegally & unlawfully designated as "sex slaves," "possessions of the right hand," "Ma malakat aymanukum," free for their "owner" to sexually abuse, & rape, even if they are married!

As a matter of fact, according to the insistent teaching of #FalseProphetMuhammad, of Allah, in the #ImpiousQuran, & therefore part & parcel of Shariah Law, the moment a woman "becomes" a Muslim's "sex slave," her previously subsisting marriage "has come to an end"!

Iljam, & Shariah Law allows for a girl of 6 Lunar calendar years, old, to be "married," & the "marriage" "consummated" when she turns 9 lunar calendar years old, which is between 8 & 8.5 solar calendar years old, in accordance with Iljamic & Shariah Law norms that the #FalseProphetMuhammad, the #MostMorallyDepravedMan in history, as yet, even more so than Genghis Khan, Martin Luder, John Chauvin, HenryVIII, Elizabeth Boleyn, Cromwell, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, etc., etc., is in fact, the Greatest Ideal & Morally Exemplary Man, who must be unquestioningly emulated!

Furthermore, in accordance with the Iljamic norm that the FalseProphetMuhammad is the Best, the Most Exemplary Man, Iljam, & Shariah Law "legalizes" the FalseProphetMuhammad's practice of "Thighing," or Masturbating with the body of the "wife" younger than 9 lunar calendar years old, ejaculating sperm all over her & himself! (See God's commands to Moses on Onanism & Masturbation). 

However, as a matter of fact, the Quran & Shariah Law explicitly "allows" as "Law directly enacted by Allah, & therefore, superior to any Civil Law," civil and or secular laws that Iljamics say are "manmade laws made in violation and in contravention of Allah's law," the "marriage" of Prepubescent girls of absolutely any age whatsoever, by the consent of her father!

As a result, Shariah Law admits of absolutely no age restriction for the "marriage" of a girl, even of a new born girl!

This is the "Shariah Law" that Sajid Rashidi pretends is better suited for India, & Indians, in place of whatever Civil Laws that now currently obtain, and, which this monster, this Demon in human form, Sajid Rashidi, pretends will curb Sexual harassments, abuse and rapes of girls and women! 

Selfcertified Misogynists such as the Tate Brothers approve, which is why they have apostatized to the Disease of Iljam, as more in keeping with their sedulously cultivated Misogyny!


Lucio Joao Mascarenhas, July 12, 2026. 

#ImitationOfTheirSexcrazedFakeProphet. For these #Devilworshippers, #MahomettanInfidels, a girl older than 3 years old is overaged. And they want all girls, even new born baby girls wrapped up in shrouds! Because they belong to the #DeenAsAlQadib, the #DickBrains, trained & cultivated, inculcated, deliberately, meticulously, by #Mahomettanism, to have #ZeroSelfControl, & to be #Sexcrazed 24x7, at any and every woman and girl-child! But, in imitation of their #FalseProphetMuhammad, they are not particular: #BoysAndMen (#DeenAsAlLaylatAzZutt, #DeenAsAlWildanMukhalladun, #Bachhabaazi), Goats, Camels, Watermelons, etc., will also do very well! https://shiapen.com/comprehensive/the-marriage-of-mut-ah/chapter-eight-examples-of-sunni-morality

Monday, May 18, 2026

Integralism

(Coronation of King Charles VII of France at the Cathedral of Rheims, July 17, 1429AD, in the presence of St. Joan of Arc, painting by Jules Eugene Lenepveu.)

I Am Astonished To See This. The Author Demonstrates Absolutely Zero #IntellectualRigor In Isolating The Tenets Of #Integralism That He Purports To Object To. But, More Importantly, This Article Is So Breathtakingly Heresy, I Can't Believe It. The Author Is Also Either Intellectually Dishonest, Or Blitheringly Incompetent: He Suggests That The Catholic Doctrine Of #ConfessionalStates Originated At About The Time Of #PopeStPiusX! And He Adds Icing To His Concoction Of Heresy By Trotting Out The Old #AntiCatholic Chestnut Of "But There Were BadAndImmoralPopes!" #NoPopery By Fr #HubertThurston.

Statism Masquerading As Integralism Is Still Not Integralism. Integralism Is Catholic Doctrine, Flowing From Unabrogated Parts Of The Old Testament, Mandating ConfessionalStates & Was Always Taught By The Catholic Church Over The Last 2000 Years; Integralism & Subsidiarity Are Both Taught By The #HolyBible #OldTestament «Where there is no governor, the people shall fall: but there is safety where there is much counsel.» Proverbs xi, 14, & «Designs are brought to nothing where there is no counsel: but where there are many counsellors, they are established.» Proverbs xv, 22.. Subsidiarity Is An Integral Part Of Integralism. Integralism Is Not An Opinion, It Is Doctrine & Dogma Of The One Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church: "Papocracy," UnamSanctam, SynodOfVerona, AdAbolendam, CumExApostolatusOfficio, RegnansInExcelsis, InterCetera, Etc., Etc. It Chartered The Portuguese & Spanish Ages Of Exploration & World Empires. And True Catholic Integralism Is Not Statist, Authoritarian: In Matters Of Both Church & Civil Governance, Catholicism Has Learned, & Recognized, & Incorporated Political Pluralism. The Ottonian Roman Empire Was Headed By The Emperor Who Was Also Head Of All Catholic Christendom, And Included Monarchial & Truly Autonomous Republican SubStates, Until The Treaty Of Westphalia, Such As The Republics Of Venice & Genoa, The Republican Hanseatic League & The Republican Swiss Confederation, Etc. The Heresy Isn't Integralism, The Heresy Is Monarchism, Born From The Renaissance, When Pagan Ideas Were Revived, & Began As Caesaropapism, & Culminated In Westphalia's Deification Of Statism Under "#CuiusRegioEiusReligio!" Statism Created "Anglicanism," Pombalism, Josephinism, The Falsely So-Called "French Revolution," World Wars 1&2.

The author Pertinaciously, Mendaciously, violates the authoritative & disciplinary provisions of the Syllabus of Condemned Errors, issued by Pope Pius IX, and of Satis Cognitum issued Pope Leo XIII, both being statement or reiterations of DivineLaw. 

The author also violates the teachings of the Catholic Church as she has authoritatively taught it over the last 2000 years, not just as reiterated by Pope Paul IV in his Apostolic Constitution CumExApostolatusOfficio, by heretically affirming that the last 7 Apostate Apostasiarchs Antipopes of the schismatic, Heretic and formally Apostate RomanProtestant sect of Roncallitism AKA VaticanTwoism AKA NovusOrdoism, such as the current incumbent Apostasiarch Antipope, the Sicilian Apostate layman & fraudster & mafiosi, Roberto Martinez "Prevost" Riggitano who I sarcastically call "PopeStLeoXIV," are "Catholic Popes"!

Thereby, the author demonstrates that he a total stranger to the Catholic faith!


Lucio Joao Mascarenhas, May 18, 2026.

Friday, May 01, 2026

Obedience To A Pope

Do Catholics Owe Blind Obedience To The Pronouncements Of A Pope, Real, Or Putative?


MAGISTERIUM

PROLOG

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; & not to defend truth is to suppress it, &, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men — when we can do it — is no less a sin than to encourage them" — Pope St. Felix III. 

"In our time more than ever before, the chief strength of the wicked lies in the cowardice & weakness of good men.... All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics" — Pope St. Pius X, Dec. 13, 1908.

"The preservation of the faith & the salvation of souls are the supreme law of the Church" - Pope Pius XII, Address to the Roman Rota, November 2, 1944.

OTHER

"Although it is evidently established by you that Peter is a heretic, you are not bound to denounce him...." — Error Condemned by Pope Alexander VII, Denzinger 1105.

The Third Council of Constantinople: "If any ecclesiastic or layman shall go into the synagogue of the Jews or to the meeting-houses of heretics to join in prayer with them, let them be deposed & deprived of communion. If any bishop or priest or deacon shall join in prayer with heretics, let him be suspended from communion."

"...where the power to command is wanting, or where a law is enacted contrary to reason, or to the eternal law, or to some ordinance of God, obedience is unlawful, lest while obeying man, we become disobedient to God" - Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical Libertas Præstantissimum, June 20, 1888.

CONSENSUS OF THEOLOGICIANS

"He who does evil because he has been commanded does not perform an act of obedience but rather of rebellion; he upsets the order: he neglects obedience to God in order to obey men" — St. Bernard of Clairvaux, The Complete Works of St. Bernard, Charpentier, Book I, Ep.VII.

St. Thomas Aquinas: "When there is a proximate danger for the faith, prelates must be questioned even publicly by their subjects."

"Disobedience is not schism, no matter how obstinate it is, for as long as it does not contain a rebellion against the authority of the Pope or of the Church" — St. Thomas of Aquinas, Summa Theologica, IIa IIae, Q.39, A.1 ad.8.

St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: "... for men are not bound, or able to read hearts; but when they see that someone is a heretic by his external works, they judge him to be a heretic pure & simple, & condemn him as a heretic."

"The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: 'Here is the wolf!' when it enters the flock or anywhere else — St. Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life

"Peter has no need of our lies or flattery. Those who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy See — they destroy instead of strengthening its foundations" — Melchior Cano, Theologian of the Council of Trent.

"The heresy which is now being born, will become the most dangerous of all: the exaggeration of the respect due to the pope & the illegitimate extension of his infallibility." — Fr. Le Floch, Rector, French Seminary, Rome, 1926. (Fr. Henri Le Floch, 1862–1950, was a French Spiritan priest who served as the rector of the Pontifical French Seminary in Rome from 1904 to 1927).

"To adhere to a false Bishop of Rome is to be out of communion with the Church" — Saint Cyprian of Carthage, rejecting the claims of the Novatian & Donatist Antipopes in Rome.

"Wrong is wrong even if everybody is doing it, & right is right even if nobody is doing it" — St. Augustine of Hippo.

"Finally, one cannot consider as schismatics those who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person suspect or because of widespread rumors, doubtfully elected" — Wernz-Vidal, Canon Law Commentary, Iuris Canonicum, Rome, Gregorian Univ., 1937, Vol. II, p. 398.

NON-CATHOLIC SOURCES

"At one point in the Church's history, only a few years before Gregory Nazianz’s present preaching (+380 A.D.), perhaps the number of Catholic bishops in possession of sees, as opposed to Arian bishops in possession of sees, was no greater than something between 1% & 3% of the total. Had doctrine been determined by popularity, today we should all be deniers of Christ & opponents of the Holy Spirit.… In the time of the Emperor Valens (4th century), Basil was virtually the only orthodox Bishop in all the East who succeeded in retaining charge of his see… If it has no other importance for modern man, a knowledge of the history of Arianism should demonstrate at least that the Catholic Church takes no account of popularity & numbers in shaping & maintaining doctrine: else, we should long since have had to abandon Basil & Hilary & Athanasius & Liberius & Ossius & call ourselves after Arius!" — Fr. William Jurgens.