Why Is Vaughn Treco Pulling His Punches On "Another Spirit"?

"Two Opposite Spirits in the Church," as remarked upon by "Father" Vaughn Treco

By Lucio Mascarenhas, 8th December 2019. Rewritten June 8, 2020.

Recently, I saw, and commented, on "Fr" Vaughn Treco's sermon of Nov 2018 titled, "The Fathers' Grapes and the Children's Teeth," that got him "excommunicated" April 1, 2019.

In that Sermon, Treco had stressed that "Popes" John 23-2 and Paul6 had explicitly "opened the doors... to a new spirit," a spirit that is distinctly and definitely not the same Spirit that Jesus had promised "unto the end of time," and had sent down, at Pentecost.

WHAT I WRITE here, will make no sense at all, unless you listen to, or better still, read Treco's sermon, and note, and digest, his urgent contrast between the Spirit of Catholicism, and the "Spirit Of Vatican2." Read Treco's sermon here: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/4247-vatican-revolution-diocesan-priest-s-had-enough.

Alternative: https://archive.is/mEhk1

Treco says: «John XIII said at the opening of the Council... and Paul VI reminded everyone at the Council as he brought it to a close... that it was their express will to unleash a new Spirit into the Church by way of the Council.... A spirit which they each affirmed in their own way would be unlike the Spirit of Catholicism which had preceded it!

«I have come to the realization that the effort (to reconcile the Spirit of Catholicism with the "Spirit of Vatican2") can no longer be made with integrity!»

However, this point that Fr Treco mentioned, while being true, begs further elaboration, which Fr Treco delicately refuses to do, PULLING HIS PUNCHES. It is not difficult to see why.

Fr Treco has effectively joined the Ambiscamnists, a "Traditionalist" sect where the implications of elaborating on "...a different spirit" would not be welcome; and which would militate against the stand Fr Treco has chosen to stand on: "I will recognize, and Resist!" (#RNR). Fr Treco says he recognizes the "Vatican2 Popes," and rejects Sedevacantism.

But Catholicism itself is not coy about this question, but boldly takes that to its logical conclusion: Jesus sent His Holy Ghost, the Third Person of the Triune Godhead, as Soul and Guide, of His Church, for all time. And, there can be no other Spirit welcome in His Church, but any other Spirit is from Satan, any other Spirit is Satan."

Also, against Treco I affirm with the Vatican Council, 1869-1870, that "Peter never betrayed Jesus after his Institution as Pope, and it cannot be Peter that brings in a strange, foreign Spirit into the Church." Indeed, Treco, in his sermon, openly contradicts the authoritative and doctrinal "Pastor Aeternus" of the Vatican Council, 1869-1870!

"Pastor Aeternus" has formally and infallibly taught:

1. "Has always kept the true Religion unsullied." (213.4)



2. "That the faith can suffer no Diminution here." (216.3)



3. "In its faith, the whole, true and perfect security of the Christian religion resides." (213.5)



4. "Because of its greater sovereignty, it was always necessary for every church to be in agreement with the Roman Church." (204.5)

The inescapable conclusion from Treco's sermon, is that there is a strict and unavoidable obligation to flee from the "Vatican2" sect, its Antipopes, it's Foreign, Demonic Spirit.

"Thus saith the Lord: 'Stand ye on the ways, and see and ask for the old paths which is the good way, and walk ye in it: and you shall find refreshment for your souls.' And they said: 'We will not walk.' And I appointed watchmen over you, saying: 'Hearken ye to the sound of the trumpet.' And they said: 'We will not hearken.'" (Jeremias vi, 16-17).

"Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore, 'Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.'" (2 Corinthians vi, 14fl). Amen. Return to Catholicism, to the Catholic Pope, to His Holiness Pope Michael1. — Lucio Mascarenhas.


LUCIO MASCARENHAS confesses the lawful Catholic Vicar of Christ, Pope Michael I, elected 1990, and as found at https://www.vaticaninexile.com

Fr Vaughn Treco, Excerpts from Sermon, Nov 25, 2018,

«For Pope John XIII said at the opening of the Council... and Pope Paul VI reminded everyone as the Council he brought to a close... that it was their express will to unleash a new Spirit into the Church by way of the Council.... A spirit which they each affirmed in their own way would be unlike the Spirit of Catholicism which had preceded it! «2. Although it is exceedingly painful to say, I have come to the realization that... It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this "spirit" of the Council, with its opening to the so-called "modern world" in ambiguous texts unlike any that any previous Council had ever adopted, has caused a rupture within the Church.... Recognizing the problem with the Council's apparent departure from Catholic tradition, Pope Benedict XVI made a valiant effort to propose what he called a Hermeneutic of Continuity or Reform (Note: "A reform of the reform," intended to approximate back to Pre-Conciliar Catholicism). THAT IS, a way of interpreting the teachings of the Second Vatican Council so that they can be embraced together with the infallible teachings of the councils and Popes which came before.... At this point, the thoughtful Catholic should ask himself: Why should it be necessary to try to reconcile the teaching of one Council with all other councils that came before it? This had never happened before in the history of the Church! I have come to the realization that this effort can no longer be made with integrity!» He opened the door of the Catholic Church to other religions and also to the world. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/John_XXIII "We were all made in God's image, and thus, we are all Godly alike." (Sources: 1. Canonisation of Blessed John Paul II and Blessed John XXIII, The National Catholic Church of the United Kingdom and Ireland, 4 July 2013, archived from the original on 7 April 2014 2. Gormley, Beatrice (26 September 2017). Pope Francis : the people's pope. New York: Aladdin. ISBN 148148141X. OCLC 973067191) In November 2003, Michael Novak describes what has been called the "spirit" of the Second Vatican Council as something that: "Sometimes soared far beyond the actual, hard-won documents and decisions of Vatican II.... It was as though the world (or at least the history of the Church) were now to be divided into only two periods, pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II. Everything 'pre' was then pretty much dismissed, so far as its authority mattered. For the most extreme, to be a Catholic now meant to believe more or less anything one wished to believe, or at least in the sense in which one personally interpreted it. One could be a Catholic 'in spirit'. One could take Catholic to mean the 'culture' in which one was born, rather than to mean a creed making objective and rigorous demands. One could imagine Rome as a distant and irrelevant anachronism, embarrassment, even adversary. Rome as 'them.'" (Michael Nowak, 24 November 2003, "Introduction to The Open Church (Millennium Edition)". American Enterprise Institute.)