Is Diego Maradona in Heaven or Hell? Can I Judge?
Lucio Mascarenhas, Nov 28, 2020. https://www.vaticaninexile.com.
When Diego Maradona died recently, a lot of people joined in the adulation. I pointed out that he was an atheist and a Communist, one who supported the communist terrorist and murderers of hundreds of thousands of Catholics, Infidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. Hugo Chavez was a military officer who tried to seize power in a coup, later founding a Socialist-Communist populist party that won power in Venezuela. Chavez died in office of cancer, and has been succeeded by his chief acolyte, the Jew Nicholas Maduro. These two men, Hugo Chávez and Nicolas Maduro, have made Venezuela, what was once one of the richest countries in the world, into one of the very most poor countries in the world, and driven millions into starvation, beggary and exile. Diego Maradona is also most notoriously an admirer of the Communist terrorist Che Guevara who was not only a terrorist, but also raped and murdered a child. He had Che Guevara's picture tattooed on his upper arm. (By the way, the Bible forbids tattos, and today nearly all the "Catlicks" in South Asia have tattos! It is part of the "New Gospel" Identitarianism! But that is another topic).
It is said that Diego Maradona was born dirt poor, and that his father was from the native American Tupi Guarani peoples, therefore his hostility to Catholicism. In the last 500 years, the Catholic Church did more for the Tupi Guarani people than it did for any other ethnic group. The Jesuits sought and obtained from the Government of Spain the setting aside of large Indian territories called the Missions or the Jesuit Reductions, over the lands of the Tupi Guarani people, evangelized and helped them to assimilate into Latin America. Protestant England corrupted the Portuguese, through King Joseph of Braganca and his chief henchman Joseph de Melo whom King Joseph later made into the Marquis of Pombal. The two Josephs admired Protestant England and sought to conform Portugal to Protestant England, to split it away from the Catholic Church, and to "modernize" Portugal in the same way that the inhuman "Protestant Work Ethic" and the large-scale landgrabs were instituted by the Protestant Robbers / Kleptocrats who stole England from the Catholics, including in the so-called Industrial Revolution and the formation of the Capitalist system.
As part of this Protestantisation of Portugal, Portugal progressively implementing a mitigated form of Protestant White Racism & Supremacism, as practised in Protestant England, that was born out of the Heresies of Jean Chauvin, and reinforced by Jansenius. For this reason, Portugal betrayed and destroyed, the Kingdom of Congo, in Africa, which was its very close ally. At the same time, and as part of the same effort, Portugal unleashed terrorist militias called the Bandeirantes (flagbearers) or Mamelucos, on Spanish South America, on the Tupi Guarani Jesuit Missions, killing, raping, enslaving the Tupi Guarani people, as part of the Jewish, Protestant and English worldwide gameplan. South and West Brazil, the Rio Grande do Sul and other areas bordering Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia were thus invaded and annexed by Portugal, under Pombalism, to Brazil.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandeirantes
"Trickery could also be used; one common tactic was disguising themselves as Jesuits, often singing Mass to lure the natives out of their settlements. At the time, the Jesuits had a deserved reputation as the only colonial force that treated the natives somewhat fairly in the Jesuit reductions of the region. If luring the natives with promises did not work, the bandeirantes would surround the settlements and set them alight, forcing inhabitants out into the open. At a time when imported African slaves were comparatively expensive, the bandeirantes were able to sell large numbers of native slaves at a huge profit due to their relatively inexpensive price.
"By the 17th century, Jesuit missions had become a favorite target of the expeditions. A bandeira ("flag march") that took place in 1628 and was organized by Antônio Raposo Tavares raided 21 Jesuit villages in the upper Paraná Valley, ultimately capturing about 2,500 natives. A bandeira tactic was to set native tribes against each other in order to weaken them, and then to enslave both sides.
"In 1636, Tavares led a bandeira , composed of 2,000 allied Indians, 900 mamelucos, and 69 white Paulists, to find precious metals and stones and to capture Indians for slavery. This expedition alone was responsible for the destruction of most of the Jesuit missions of Spanish Guayrá and the enslavement of over 60,000 indigenous people."
"The bandeirantes were also responsible for unsteady relations between the Spanish Empire and the Portuguese Empire, as they essentially conducted an undeclared war on indigenous residents allied with Spain or the Jesuits. With only a few outlying Spanish settlements surviving and the majority of Jesuit missions overrun, the de facto control by Portugal over most of what is now the Southeast, Southern, and Central West territory of Brazil was recognized by the Treaties of Madrid in 1750 and San Ildefonso in 1777. Additionally, Portugal officially expelled the Jesuits in 1759, reducing the ability of the Jesuits to fight back even further.
"These expeditions were catastrophic for the native peoples, who were either killed through sheer violence or due to diseases and poor sanitation, or were reduced to slavery, stripped of their identity and expulsed from their ancestral lands. Nevertheless, the Bandeirantes are generally considered heroes in traditional Brazilian historiography; this may be slowly changing, as protests in 2020 have brought back up the more unsavory parts of the bandeirantes activity to light."
When I wrote that Diego Maradona, an atheist and a Communist, is now damned in hell, I was told, "How do you know? You are not the judge!"
That "Judge Not" is based on Matthew vii, Matthew chapter 7.
We all make judgments of Discernment, that has an impact on our lives and on the lives of those we accept and those we reject.
We decide what is good and what is bad, who we shall consort with and whom we shall not consort with, how we shall worship and how we shall not worship.
So, the man that tells me, "How do you know? You are not the judge!" says that he firmly judges that Karol Wojtyla and "Mother Teresa" are Saints in Heaven; these persons (Wojtyla & "Mother Teresa") taught and practiced that "All gods are one, all religions are true, one can attain Heaven through the practice of any religion whatsoever." So I have challenged him numerous times: Walk the talk! Post me pictures of you publicly worshipping the Demon Ganpati, but he recoils with horror and disgust! HE JUDGES that as a "Christian," it is "wrong" for him to teach that "All gods are one, all religions are true, one can attain Heaven through the practice of any religion whatsoever," or to worship the Monster Ganapati whether Publicly or privately! He judges! Yet, he says that I am not to judge!
If I give you a cup of drink, and say, I have mixed poison in it, but drink it anyway, for who are you, or I, to judge?, would you drink it? Would you refuse to judge the possibility, the probability, that I speak, not in jest, but in truth, and that drinking it will kill you?
We choose who to marry and who not to marry, we make a judgment.
We choose which school, academy and university we will seek admission from.
We choose what jobs we will seek.
We choose to accept certain people as our friends, some as acquaintances, some as very close, bosom buddies. We equally choose not to accept the friendship of some, not to associate with some, not to consort with them.
We choose what food to eat and what not to eat.
Those who choose to vote, choose to exercise a judgment as to who will be the best or, at least, not the worst bet, for public office.
In all this we exercise judgment.
My friend that said, "Who are you to judge?" says that he judges that George Borgoglio is "Pope Francis," and that Karol Wojtyla and "Mother Teresa" are saints in Heaven. Since Borgoglio and Wojtyla and "Mother Teresa" teach / taught that Jesus and Ganapati, are one (God), I asked him to publicly worship Ganapati. He judges that God forbids him from that. Who is he to judge against Ganapati as true God?
Let us examine the Context of Mathew vii.
"Judge not, that you may not be judged, For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you measure out, it shall be measured to you again. And why do you see the mote / speck that is in your brother's eye, and do not see the beam that is in your own eye? Or how do you say to your brother: Let me cast the mote out of your eye; and behold a beam is in your own eye? You hypocrite! cast out first the beam in your own eye, and then you shall the better see to cast out the mote out of your brother's eye! Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast you your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you to pieces. Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you. For every one that asketh, receives: and he that seeks, finds: and to him that knocks, it shall be opened. Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he give him a stone? Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he give him a snake? If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Father who is in Heaven, give good things to them that ask Him? All things therefore whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them. For this is the Law and the Prophets." Matthew chapter 7 http://drbo.org/chapter/47007.htm.
Is that an absolute "Judge Not"?
How can we "judge" as to what is a "beam" and what instead is a "mote" or a "speck," if we are absolutely to "Judge Not"?
How can we judge that what we are giving to dogs, or casting before swine, is "Holy," or "Pearls," and not to be given / cast before, if we are absolutely to "Judge Not"?
How are we to discern and to judge, if we are absolutely to "Judge Not"?
The Gospel of John puts this differently: "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge just judgment." John vii, 24 http://drbo.org/chapter/50007.htm.
So that is then not an absolute "Judge Not."
I will quote a "Newchurcher" on "Judge Not": A Newchurcher is one who follows the Roman Protestant Vatican 2 self described "New Church," giving the Catholic Bible (Douay-Challoner-MacMahon version) where he cites the Protestant Bible (It is usual for Newchurchers to quote Protestant Bibles rather than Catholic Bibles!)
«Just and righteous are both translations of the same Hebrew word.
«"For Yahweh loveth judgment, and forsaketh not his saints; they are preserved for ever: but the seed of the wicked shall be cut off." Psalm 37:28 (Protestant) "For the Lord loves judgment, and will not forsake His saints: they shall be preserved for ever. The unjust shall be punished, and the seed of the wicked shall perish." (Catholic).
r «"Yahweh openeth [the eyes of] the blind: Yahweh raiseth them that are bowed down: Yahweh loveth the righteous." Psalm 146:8 (Protestant) "The Lord enlightens the blind. The Lord lifts up them that are cast down: the Lord loves the just." (Catholic).
«"Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?" 1 Corinthians 6:2-6 (Protestant) "Know you not that the saints shall judge this world? And if the world shall be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know you not that we shall judge angels? how much more the things of this world?" (Catholic).
"You shall do My judgments, and keep Mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the Lord your God. Ye shall therefore keep My statutes, and My judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord." Leviticus 18:4-5 (Protestant) "You shall do My judgments, and shall observe My precepts, and shall walk in them. I am the Lord your God. Keep My laws and My judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them. I am the Lord." (Catholic).
"Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour." Leviticus 19:15 (Protestant). "You shall not do that which is unjust, nor judge unjustly. Respect not the person of the poor, nor honour the countenance of the mighty. But judge your neighbour according to justice." (Catholic).»
Did Jesus Christ actually say in an absolute sense, "Do not judge"? When examined carefully, it is obvious that that is the pretence of Hypocrites. Yes, that is right: I judge that that pretence, a pretension that Jesus Christ absolutely forbade us from making judgements, as Hypocrisy and as the last refuge of Hypocrites!
We live in the time of a man who claims to be the highest authority for Christians, who says, Who am I to judge? when asked about Homosexuals, and then, in effect says that orthodox Catholics are Clericalists, Pelagians, Coprophages (Shit eaters in plain english), Rosary counters, and such like. He judges Donald Trump as a "bad Christian," and indeed as "not a Christian," but anyone who works to destroy what remains of Christianity and of Christendom, he judges as the most moral of persons! There is a very open Hypocrisy in his Judging of some and in his "Refusal" to Judge others, in his Condemnation of some and in his Loving Embrace of others. Most remarkable, and something that is rather open and in-your-face is his Loving Embrace of those that God insistently Condemns and Excludes, and his Hatred of, and Maliciousness towards, those that God and His Catholic Church have always praised and extolled! He condemns those who are loyal to God, and he exculpates those that practise Sodomy, which God said is the practically the most obscene sin and crime! Yet, people not only do not take this man to task, do not Judge this Poor Excuse of a Pagan, this High Priest of Pachamama, and an Apostate, they take me to task, they sit in judgement over me, for questioning this man's "Divine Right" to anti-Catholic hypocrisy! They judge that Jesus Christ forbade me from judging, but that they may judge!
This man, High Priest of Pachamama, of the Bloodthirsty Demoness Pachamama to whom the pre-Columbian Pagans sacrificed and poured forth the blood of babies, is the 6th in his line of frauds who condemns Catholics and who exculpate Sodomists. This line of Rascals of the First Order have made it their Official teaching that "The Catholic Church does not condemn Sodomism as evil, or exclude Sodomites from her life!" In a way, however, they are truthful, for the "Church" they head and govern is as Catholic as Julian the Apostate or as the Aga Khan or the Dalai Lama!
I will now "digress" by quoting the great Doctor of the Church, St John the Golden-Mouthed (Chrysostom means Golden mouth).
"'Judge not, and ye shall not be judged' (Luke vi, 37). What does this mean? Are we not to denounce those who sin? Why, then, does Paul say, ‘Reprove, entreat, rebuke!' (2 Timothy iv, 2), and 'Reprove before (ie, in front of) everyone those who sin' (1 Timothy v, 20)? Christ also said to Peter, ‘Rebuke him, and if he will not obey, tell the Church' (Matthew xviii, 15-17). Why, then, did He give His Apostles the power of the keys? For, if they are not to judge, they are without authority, and in vain have they received the power of binding and loosing. Besides, if this were the case, everything in the churches and cities and homes would come to an end. And, unless we correct our enemies, we shall never put an end to enmity, and everything would be turned upside down. Therefore, let us take care to study the meaning of what is said here, so that no one may think that the remedies of our salvation are laws of disorder and confusion. For, Our Lord has made as clear as possible to those who have understanding the perfection of this law, saying: 'First cast the beam out of your own eye' (Luke vi, 42). You see, He does not forbid us to judge, but commands us first to remove the beam from our own eyes, and only then correct the faults of others." (St. John Chrysostom, On Matthew, homily XXIV, pg. 57, SS vol. III).
What is obvious is that Jesus Christ warns against, and forbids and excludes Rash and Presumptuous Judgment, and Hypocritical Judgment. The Catholic Church has always taught that we can and must judge but that we must very certainly not be Rash in judging, for Rashness is the very opposite of Justice, nor must we be Presumptuous, not Presume to place ourselves in the position of the Supreme judge, who is God, claiming to lay down absolute and definite judgment.
Do I? Have I judged Diego Maradona Rashly, Presumptuously, Hypocritically?
I have stated what I have stated based on Catholic theology.
1. Catholicism states that all those outside the Catholic Church, will be damned. The only exception is Invincible Ignorance. Are we able to even Pretend that Diego Maradona may had suffered from Invincible Ignorance? Not without doing violence to the Truth!
2. The Catholic Church affirms that only the God of the Bible, which is the Triune God, consisting of three distinct persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, is the true God; that Jesus Christ is God the Son who became flesh as a real human being, and that He willingly gave Himself up into the hands of the wicked, of the sinners, that He may be illtreated and murdered, for the Sins of all humanity, that Jesus Christ then rose up again from the Dead, that He then ascended to Heaven where He sits at the Right Hand of God the Father; that He founded a definite body as His Church, replacing the Mosaic Church or the Church of the Covenant that was entrusted to the Prophet Moses, with the renewed Church as the Christian Church, not a new creation but a continuation of the same body of the faithful as before; that there is No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church, etc.
3. The Catholic Church, Canon Law and the Popes have repeatedly stated that a person who publicly and with pertinacity (stubbornness), recedes from the holistic Catholic faith in even one point, they have thereby ceased to be Catholics: such are called, in Canon Law, "Public and Manifest Heretics" or "Public and Manifest Apostates," as the case may be.
4. That the Catholic Church teaches that when an Ecumenical Council that is accepted and endorsed by a legitimate Catholic Pope as the Head of the College of Bishops, speaks, it is God that speaks, through God the Holy Ghost. The Council of Florence in its Decree for the Jacobites, "Cantate Domino," taught that all those who refused to submit to the Catholic Church or who have publicly and manifestly abandoned or left the Catholic Church, and died, unreconciled, to the Catholic Church, are, Eternally Damned to Hell, by Jesus Christ. Let me quote verbatim: "It firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart 'into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matthew xxv, 41) unless, before the end of life, the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed his blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."
Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Fidel "Infidel" Castro, Che Guevara, were "born Catholics," born, at least nominally, to Catholic parents.
Are they (Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, Fidel "Infidel" Castro, Che Guevara, etc.) persons who have died as faithful Catholics?
Did Diego Maradona die as a faithful Catholic?
If Chi Guevara (I deliberately use "Chi" which is Indian for "filthy" instead of "Che") and Diego Maradona died as faithful Catholics, then so did Hitler and Goebbels!
If Chi Guevara is a "Martyr," then so are Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels!
Is there a Rascal, a Public Reprobate, a Spiritual Prostitute, so barefaced and brazen faced, as to allege that the Eternally Damned Chi Guevara, Diego Maradona, Infidel Castro, and the Traidores Simon Bolivar, Joseph Martin, Manuel Belgrano, Raymond Castilla, Andrew de Santa Cruz, Joseph Artigas, Francis de Miranda, Marian Moreno, Bernardo Ohiggins, Agustin Iturbide, Anthony Sucre, Peter da Braganca, etc., are not Eternally Damned but are Saints in Heaven?
Even if there are such Liars, a Christian is bound to ignore and to contemn them, and not join them.
But you that disagree, don't be hypocrites, "walk the talk," "go the whole hog," post me pictures of you publicly worshipping the Demon Ganpati! Put your actions were your mouths are!
Lúcío Mascarenhas, Plenipotentiary Apostolic of His Holiness Pope Michael I #ReturnToCatholicism https://www.vaticaninexile.com/joining_the_true_catholic_church.php
