RODERICANISM: THE ALLEGED "ILLUMINATION OF CONSCIENCES PROPHECIES"
A Novusordinarian priest has shared with me a YouTube video of a sermon by a "Fr" Beard on the so-called "Illumination of the Conscience" alleged prophecies. For convenience, I will abbreviate this as "IOC."
The first thing that springs to my mind, on hearing of the IOC, is the superficial similarity, with the long foretold, very well known, widely disseminated, prophecies of the "Three Days of Darkness," (for convenience, I will abbreviate it as "TDOD"), made by Catholic visionaries, seers, prophets, saints, etc. consistently over more than the last 500 years!
It is alleged that St Edmund Campion, Blessed Ana Maria Tiagi, Pope Pius IX, and Marie-Julie Jahenny, among others , had spoken about this "IOC," but strangely, I have never heard of these "IOC prophecies" before.
The question is: Why? There are two prominent, famous modern authors on Catholic prophecies and the TDOD: Msgr. Richard Gerald Culleton, died 1950, and Yves Dupont, died 1973. Neither of them mentioned the IOC.
How is it that these "IOC prophecies" were not generally known before?
I am writing to ask if any of you have information to share about these alleged "prophecies," and any resources for me to learn more about them.
My first, knee-jerk reaction: The Catastrophe prophesized in the form of the "Three Days of Darkness," (TDOD), is so-well known, that there is even a Wikipedia article on it. I believe that the "IOC" is spurious, and intended as a counter-blast to the "TDOD" prophecies. Certainly, these two, the TDOD & the IOC, are opposite to each other.
READING CAREFULLY, I see that with Campion, Tiagi, Jahenny, Pius IX, etc., they spoke about the TDOD, but that the partisans of the IOC have falsified their words, have conflated their known and approved utterances & prophecies of the TDOD with the INNOVATION of the IOC, by an open and blatant stratagem of "Suppressio veri et suggestio falsi"! Partisans of the IOC transfer over these TDOD prophecies to the IOC, which is illegitimate, a blatant fraud!
As far as Faustina Kowalska is concerned, there is again a blatant falsification, a misrepresentation of an episode in her own private revelations, of her alleged personal "Illumination of her conscience" into a claim that she had "prophesized" the same specific "prophecies" of the IOC.
It is rather interesting that the first time I have heard of the "IOC," is in response to my article, "It Is Broad Daylight," in which I mentioned the TDOD!
WHAT I HAVE FOUND is that the IOC "prophecies" originate in alleged private revelations by a "Fr" Michel Rodrigue, a Francophone Canadian, and, a Crackmatic.
That is two strikes against Michel Rodrigue: That he is publicly a member (and worse, a teaching member) of an Apostate Sect, the Most Satanist Sect as yet in Salvation History, and that he is an adherent of the fantastic and corybantist Crackmaticism or Pseudo-Pentecostalism!
In Latin Rodrigue is Rodericus, and so I will call this Rodericanism. This seems to be a lunatic offspring of the lunatic Crackmaticism, just as the lunatic Ponnaranism or "Emperor Emmanuel Sect" is a lunatic offspring of the lunatic Crackmaticism!
Rodericanism is also being propagated by a Christine Watkins, through her book, "The Warning: Testimonies and Prophecies of the Illumination of Consciences," co-authored by a "Bishop" Gavin Ashenden.
Gavin Roy Pelham Ashenden, born 3 June 1954, is an Englishman, who was formerly a Henrican ("Church of England") "priest," until 2017, resigning in wake of protesting against an incident where the Henrican Church in Scotland invited a Mahomettan Infidel into the pulpit where he recited a Quranic verse denying that Jesus Christ is God incarnate; from 2017-2019, he was a "bishop" in a dissident Henrican sect; in 2019, he was received into the Roman Protestant sect, where he is recognized only as a layman, not as a priest or bishop.
Two of Rodericus' "bishops" have disapproved of his "Revelations." There is no known approbation. There are also no known official condemnations of Rodericanism by the Apostate Sect. Approbations or condemnations by men with no authority at all have no meaning, as it is. Gilles Lemay, Rodericus' "ordinary" has disavowed support and approval for him, his messages, etc., affirmed that claims in Watkins & Ashenden's book that he was cognizant with these messages and approved of them, are false, and must be removed. They were removed. Robert Bourgon, "ordinary" of the "diocese of Hearst-Moosonee," in which Rodericus is "incardinated," wrote a public letter supporting or seconding Gilles Lemay.
James Akin has weighed in on the subject, apparently against Rodericus. Mr Akin is a notorious fraud, a thoroughly unsavory character, from personal experience in the "Aarti Controversy," and I will afford him no credibility, no cognizance.
Besides, Rodericus, there are other alleged spin-off & copy-cat "visionaries," all Novusordinarian Apostates. None of them have obtained approval.
In sum, Rodericanism is: Lies, more lies and more damned lies.
Lucio Joao Mascarenhas
Dhobi Talao, Bombay-2
No comments:
Post a Comment